Happy Friday! Gorgeous Last Day in SB before 2 Weeks in NYC after Fun Night at Wine Bistro (Pierre La Fond) Thursday and Pico Iyer at the Lobero on Wednesday

Yesterday at Miramar when high tide prevented pre-Wine Bistro walk.

This is an historic day. Not because of the Chicago riots or the economic train wreck in Europe. I am speaking, of course, of my own cleaning of my apartment. Realize I don’t spend that much time here, though in the last two months more than the twelve months prior. I’m either at my parents’ house or J’s, or a friend’s house in another city. I usually get someone in every four months and had someone in when I showed the vacant second bedroom to roommate prospects. But there is no denying that when left to my own devices I do manifest the shiksa slob tendencies of my mother in her youth. It’s not horrible but not something which would pass muster either with my father or J, who as dissimilar as they are in many respects, are both Jew with OCD about various things including neatness and cleanliness.

Readers of Victorian Chick and Facebook will know that Dad heroically rescued me from the strange (to me) fate of a roommate. I have lived alone my entire adult life except for one semester at Yale.  Of course, it is much easier to keep a house or apartment clean when you never eat or sleep there. It only took about an hour and as I posted on Facebook, much to the amusement of my friends, I didn’t get hysterical and start sweeping or mopping floors: no sense in going overboard with this cleaning fetish. But I am happy I saved 60 bucks or so and I didn’t have much to do carless waiting for Saab to report back on the a/c. (Still no word, which can’t be good so I thought I would blog.)

Pico Iyer was extraordinary. He began with a funny joke about all the “disappointed souls” in the audience who must have planned to see John Cusack at UCSB before a last minute cancellation. (I was such a soul, but far from a disappointed one.) As I wrote this week, I heard him in 1993 at a Master’s Tea at Yale in Davenport College, which turns out to have been his only time at Yale though he lived in Manhattan during his Time magazine days.

I was in Berkeley College (BK) and had I been assigned to Davenport College (DC), my social life would have been very different. The singles in BK are not habitable even post-renovation which made everything much nicer of course but did not alter room size.  And I had taken off three semesters off after my first term, so I was out of the roommate lottery. I loved having that gorgeous 10th floor studio apartment in the Taft with a tiny view of Long Island Sound from my large kitchen (strangely large kitchen for a studio which of course was of no consequence to me as I didn’t cook much, but more then than at any time post-college), but it did isolate me somewhat.

Iyer is the only person I have ever heard who speaks more quickly than I do with more attenuated (but far more crafted and elegant) syntax. I absolutely adore him, though I have no desire ever to visit a Third World country, with the possible exception of beach resorts in Central America where you get the beauty of the Caribbean at a fraction of the cost. (I know, I know, you’re not supposed to say that; it’s “developing countries.” But does it really matter to a dirt poor country if you bullshit them into thinking they are ever going to be anything other than a dirt poor country in the Third World?)

J lived and volunteered in Costa Rica during a high school summer with a lovely family he still keeps in touch with via Facebook. My very good friend’s son is finishing up a 2 -year gig (post-law school) in Moldova for the Peace Corps. I am with J: if you are going to visit or live in a Third World country, it should at least be warm and have decent produce and a beach. That would definitely rule out Africa and with the exception of South Africa, I have no notion of why anyone would go there. My friend from 7th grade at Westlake to the middle of med school at Harvard and my Masters program at UCSB traveled a lot. Her parents, a wealthy gastroenterologist and late-in-life boutique immigration attorney in Beverly Hills, went on one of those 5 star safaris. Unless Robert Redford were part of the package (shampooing of hair optional), I’m not interested. (Klaus Maria Brandaer would do.) Similarly, the idea of going to an Islamic country intrigues me about as much as cleaning a toilet.

As for the First World, I’m very bourgeois and lacking in the spirit of adventure. I’m not really interested in traveling to Asia (maybe Japan if I could fly business but flying steerage, as my father calls coach or economy class, for 20 hours, no matter how much Ativan I popped, also does not appeal to me). I don’t want to go to Russia or Eastern Europe either.  I don’t have a burning desire to go anywhere in the Middle East, with the possible exception of Tel Aviv (and again, only business or first; I won’t do steerage to Israel).

I have never been to the European continent (just England twice and Ireland once) and of course this is something I intend to do sometime in my 40s or 50s, but it is not financially in the cards for me to travel to more than one place, perhaps, in 2013. I could go but it would mean not traveling to New York every two months and even with cheap Orbitz tickets and no rent, my New York sojourns rule out transatlantic travel.

In 2013, I want to go both to London and to the Lake District, ambling across the countryside where Wordsworth and Coleridge developed and articulated their vision of Romantic poetics. I’d love to see the Moors which gave rise to the Bronte sisters’ dark, imaginative masterpieces, along with the bleak, beautiful landscape which informed Hardy’s consciousness and resulted in his tragic vision, from Tess of the D’Urbervilles (my first Hardy novel) to the almost unreadable Jude.  Hardy is also a great poet though fewer know him for his poetry. I want to return to Ireland and visit Edinburgh for the first time.

Eliot often said that the best Brits were Scots, more so of course after she met her beloved friend and publisher, John Blackwood, along with Johnnie Cross, her dear friend and later husband of less than two years prior to her death in 1880.  My landlord is of course the exception which proves the rule, as he is quite ghastly and never tires of reminding me of his Scottish heritage and his poor coal miner father. I’m not convinced this gets him out of providing me with heat and a garage space as promised in the lease for years on end, however sorry I am that his father was so poor.

I’m an Anglophile, what can I say? But someday, I very much want to visit Spain, Italy, Greece, Germany, and France.  However, my utter lack of interest in “challenging” travel–Yemen or Oman, for instance–interferes not at all to my appreciation of Iyer’s profound vision of what travel does for the self and the soul alike. Iyer embodies kindness and joy in a way which even his elegant and sophisticated written language cannot fully convey.

Physically and emotionally, he seems relatively unchanged in twenty years. The core message of his new book–The Man Within My Mind–is that travel’s deepest meaning involves an inner journey sparked by the outer one. Iyer anchors these reflections in an exploration of Graham Greene’s fiction, which I’ve not read. I’m far less good on 20th-century fiction than the poetry and prose (both fiction and nonfiction) of the 18th and 19th centuries. (And you wonder why I’m not fabulously rich with this oh so useful store of knowledge cultivated over many years?)

His story of the kind elderly man in Yemen who risked his life to get him to the north from the south when his flight was delayed by four days (which could have been four months, apparently) was but one of his moving tales about the kindness of strangers. Sometimes the help came with a price or at least, an agenda, as with the Bolivian nurse who wanted help with a green card, or the man in another distant land who wanted his passport so he could see the world, reasoning that it would not be hard for Iyer, an American at the time, to procure another.

I was moved, however, by his comments about Yemen which of course we in America, post-9/11, understandably consider the incarnation of evil. Iyer claims that in a population of 24 million people, 700 Al Queda are hiding in Yemen, with an addition 10,000 assisting them. And I am sure you have to visit some of these places to realize emotionally what you know intellectually: not all Muslims are out to destroy the West. Of course, there are the Jihadists and they are evil.

But in so many of these countries, there are the powerless poor who worry about the same things Americans do: how to feed, clothe, shelter, educate, nurture their children. While I will take Iyer’s word for it, in part because I think the point of a vacation is to be happy, not depressed about the totally fucked up state of the world, I do see the value in his message about the humanizing influence of travel to “unpleasant places.” I just don’t do unpleasant here in America, much less abroad. I have neither the need nor the ability to drop a few grand on a vacation to be reminded that the world is full of pain and poverty about which I can do nothing.

I can’t wait to read Iyer’s book, along with some of the fiction he discusses therein. Iyer has a fabulous sense of humor, a kind and wry wit and understated but powerful presence and I could not have been more thrilled to speak with him afterwards for about five minutes, while he signed my book and I told him about seeing him twenty years ago with my mother in New Haven. Iyer was very funny in talking about English graduate school and before that the choice of English as a major, as a means of delaying entry into the real world. What I wouldn’t give to spend an evening hearing him talk about British poetry and fiction! He asked if I had majored in English at Yale or merely switched to English for grad school and I told him that I had. He sighed as if in recognition that the early 1990s were the tail end of one of Yale English’s golden ages. I was blessed.

Last night’s dinner at Wine Bistro, my first time there since the Montecito institution, Piatti, closed its doors early this year, was tremendous. It’s not cheap with entrees in the mid-20s and low-30s and appetizers in the mid-teens. But the flatbreads and some pastas and “favorites” are in the mid-to-high teens. You can fine a few wines for just 7 or 8, but more are in the 10 to 12 range by the glass, which is perfectly normal in Santa Barbara. The bread, both a sourdough and a multigrain in small slices, is outstanding with the sweet, fluffy butter. I adore the renovation of the internal patio and the food is vastly better than Piatti ever was, in my view the least good fine dining Italian in Santa Barbara or Montecito, though hands down the prettiest. J did not take pictures of the restaurant itself, so when I get back from the city, I will go in and take a bunch.

I had an excellent gazpacho and summer succotash side (all sides are 8 and that’s the way to go if you’re watching the bill). J had a wedge salad as good as any I have seen, with tomato, bacon and blue cheese dressing, along with a great minestrone with chive oil. I loved it. The chicken pot pie, which two men at the table next to us ordered, was beautiful and fragrant. All the fish and the meat looked and smelled beautiful and I am very much looking forward to returning to the bar and ordering the Santa Barbara Winery Sauvignon, munching on bread and soup and healthy sides. (I have pictures of all of this which WordPress will not, maddeningly, allow me to upload at the moment.)

My apartment is clean but my car is frightening, so I will cut this short and call Saab for the bad news about my a/c. I don’t have a good feeling about this! I still have to pay for my Luigi summer intensive jazz dance workshop and get to the pool before 4, though I still have one non-primetime pass left for the year. (They only give you two and I refuse to pay 20 dollars for a swim when I’m already overpaying, even with the discounted membership!)

I’ll blog tomorrow on the plane! Happy Friday!

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Victorian Chick’s Anthropology of West Los Angeles Real Estate (Pacific Palisades, Brentwood, Bel Air, Westwood, Malibu and Santa Monica–North of Montana)

 

With Wendy Plumb, owner of The Cottage, designer resale in Pacific Palisades. Baby Dior pink coat for a 3-yr-old.

I knew this iTunes thing was too good to be true. I have had the Macbook Pro about three months (used, a great deal on eBay) and it tells me there is a security breach and I cannot purchase an album. I have no iPod or iPad and have no desire for either one. My trusty Discman works fine as long as I have CDs and don’t leave them in New York apartment which I did my last trip. Saturday I fly to Newark and I’ll be on the Upper East Side Tuesday morning. I’m beyond thrilled to be going back–2 months is the sort of magic interval at which I begin to itch for New York, Luigi, the apartment and my friends–and particularly excited to reunite with my favorite CDs.

I wanted to buy the first two Shawn Colvin CDs as I was trying to get into my late high school and early Yale consciousness to write my blog on the spectacular Westlake Alumni lunch but I will save literary criticism and heavy reminiscence for a night I am not blocking out Dad’s Turner Classic Movies no doubt audible in Orange County with intermittent YouTube clips on my Macbook attached to his giant headphones.

I was with Dad today after a nice breakfast at Cafe Vida, my favorite munchkin sighting place in the Palisades, at which today there were sadly none. I gave my friend, Mark, a tour of the Palisades on a stunning and clear early summer day: first the Huntington Palisades (the oldest old money place in PP) and then the Reagan part of town near the Riviera Country Club, up Amalfi or Capri north of Sunset.

People not from LA who follow golf and know about the Riviera think the Palisades is a monolith. This could not be further from the truth. There is no relation whatever between most of the alphabet streets in the Village (Hartzell, Iliff, Fiske, Drummond) and the Huntington, the Riviera or Rustic Canyon (not to mention the tiny streets off Sunset by Will Rogers State Park like Evans Road or Rustic Lane, where Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sam Wanamaker, Hal Holbook and Dixie Carter all lived).  Rustic Canyon, the canyon between Sunset and Brooktree and Entrada Way which turns into 7th Street and runs through the Santa Monica Canyon is as different from Marquez Knolls or the Highlands as 7th and San Vicente (Santa Monica north of Montana–a key real estate designation) is from 20th north of Wilshire.

The Palisades of the 1990s is not the Palisades of 2012. Of course the Palisades of 1974, when my parents bought a modest tract house on a slightly larger-than-average suburban lot of 9000 feet, was a sleepy but nice beach town which bears no resemblance to the Palisades of today with designer boutiques like Elyse Walker (Christian Laboutin, Valentino, Victoria Beckham, Prada etc).

A dress at Elyse Walker. Laboutin shoes, slightly cut off by my friend. Today was not a good day there. Routinely, the window has drool-worthy attire (and shoes) on each size 2 mannequin.

As I told Mark, Elyse Walker with its four storefronts, used to be Colvey’s, a men’s store where Dad would on occasion buy a sweater which seemed to his friend Mel exorbitant. The clerk would tell Mel the price of a sweater and Dad’s old secular Jewish friend would offer up the typical response: “I don’t want a dozen! How much for one?” Still, Colvey’s was a store for old men and even in this economy, Elyse Walker seems to be doing just fine with the Palisades matrons, who seem to be getting younger and younger.

I have rarely seen so many hot, tight moms of 45 as in the Palisades. And they seem more natural than the prototypical Beverly Hills housewife. Note: Beverly Hills and Bel Air are not the same. What I say here does not apply to Bel Air, though parts of it are so expensive and so old, that it really does seem more, well, old. Holmby Hills is heavenly but it’s not very big and really, it’s living in Westwood so I haven’t discussed the area which includes breathtaking streets like Loring Drive, where one of my best friends from 7th to 12th grade lived. (We stayed in touch through college, though she went to Harvard, and I went to her 1997 wedding at the Bel Air Bay Club to a fellow Harvard Medical School student. We haven’t spoken since 1999 when I descended into the abyss.) Like Holmby Hills, Bel Air is almost entirely residential and if you live there, you are not spending all your time in Bel Air. Your geographic center of gravity is split among Westwood, Beverly Hills, and Brentwood (San Vicente).

In my view, you are more likely to find a woman with Ivy or Berkeley/UCLA degrees, undergraduate and professional, pushing a baby carriage in the Palisades or Brentwood than you are in Beverly Hills.  They aren’t Botoxed to the hilt and they have often entered the world of big law–O’Melveny and Myers or Skadden Arps, say–and concluded working 75 hours a week wasn’t all it was cracked up to be, regardless of their bank account. They may have been doctors and given it up or had high-powered careers in media of some sort if not the entertainment industry proper. The older women with kids applying to college also seem far classier than the flashy, gauche Beverly Hills matrons, who are more likely to have been professionally unaccomplished and/or intellectually undistinguished before marrying (for) money and having children. Your average overheard conversation in a Beverly Hills restaurant is quite dull. Not so in Santa Monica, Brentwood, or the Palisades.

I have left out of this discussion arguably my favorite and most NYC-like part of town–West Hollywood–because with current LA traffic patterns, this is another world with its own logic and reality to which you cannot rationally travel between 3PM and 7:30PM. I also like the Hollywood Hills and Laurel Canyon but that’s even further and if you live there, the Westside represents something of a field trip. To a WLA girl, Hollywood is not LA; it’s Hollywood. I like the Marina and Venice, which has gotten very trendy with the rise of Abbot Kinney and the continued appeal of Main Street, but the Hank Moody part of town obeys its own logic as well and lies outside of the WLA orbit I am here tracing.

Of course, this is my Palisades/Santa Monica/Brentwood bias. But I don’t think I’m wrong. I have been at Cafe Vida countless times in the last few years and heard a woman with a baby or toddler who has just dropped off her elementary schooler at Seven Arrows, the Village School or St. Matthew’s, talking to a friend or an older gentleman, telling her story of law or medicine and expressing her relief at having gotten out and having the privilege of staying home with one or two kids. I haven’t seen my doctor couple with three kids under three in awhile but both are tremendously impressive. They have twin boys and a male toddler.

The mom, early 40s, intends to go back to work for real and may now do something part-time, but I remember her telling me she went to Oxford for a post-college, pre-med school fellowship during which she studied with someone who knew C.S. Lewis intimately and took his office. She loves Wordsworth and I think she said she studied with Jonathan Wordsworth at one point (the descendant of William who has presided over the massive Cornell Wordsworth, whose textual focus sets them apart from traditional literary critics for whom exegesis is central). I would bet that not one woman on Real Housewives of Beverly Hills other than the Brit knows that C.S. Lewis wrote anything but the Chronicles of Narnia. I would further wager that not one of those nitwits has seen or even read a review of Shadowlands, the Debra Winger and Anthony Hopkins biopic about Lewis. Forget T.S. Eliot or the movie with Willem Dafoe and Miranda Richardson, Tom and Viv.

The Palisades and Montana Avenue commercial areas aren’t Manhattan but they are hip, sophisticated and cultured. Old people in Beverly Hills may be cultured; anyone under 60 is in my view suspect. It may be a different kind of money–I always tend to think money from business as such brings with it less intellect and culture than money from other professions or the arts–or it may just be the type of person who wants to live in Beverly Hills.

And I confess I cannot understand choosing any part of Beverly Hills (with the possible exception of Burton Way or Charleville just south of Wilshire) when one could choose Santa Monica north of Montana or the Palisades, or if one wanted to be closer to town, Westwood north or south of Wilshire. As you can see, WLA real estate is all about north and south. North and south of Sunset, San Vicente, Montana, Wilshire, Santa Monica, Olympic or (God forbid, in this world) Pico. Far south of Pico is fine if you’re in Venice by the canals or the Marina. The Silver Strand by the breakwater is lovely but it’s more like townhouses as you have no lawn or land. It’s a nice place for an affluent couple but not in my view for a family. Unless you’re in Manhattan or a similarly urban setting, in which case you forsake land and grass, I think a kid benefits from a front or back lawn.

Culver City has become trendy and very nice but it’s not close by any means and while technically WLA I suppose, it’s not really the WLA people mean if they grew up or lived in the areas I am describing. It’s expensive–still far more than most of the Valley, with the exception of the affluent parts of the East Valley (Encino, Toluca Lake, some of Studio City)–but you don’t live in Culver City if you can afford any of the areas I have been discussing here. The West Valley–Calabasas, Agoura, and Westlake Village–is affluent but that’s way the hell out there. I cannot even consider that Los Angeles and whether you’re in a studio apartment or a mansion, Valley weather is Valley weather and it sucks unless you like Palm Springs or Scottsdale in which case you’re in business.

You can’t really raise kids in Malibu unless you are content to drive a lot (or have a nanny to drive for you). And if either parent works downtown, forget about it: you better like sitting in your BMW or Audi or Lexus hybrid SUV on PCH and listening to music or gabbing on the speaker phone, because it will take you an hour plus to get to and from anywhere you need to be for professional reasons.  It’s a more isolated existence but I know and have known people who happily raised families in Malibu. That’s a whole other kind of person, usually deeply invested in the outdoors and therefore willing to forsake the convenience of living in town for the magical ocean breeze. Topanga is a kind of picturesque hippie throwback to the ’60s, with Inn of the Seventh Ray its culinary and cultural center for many years. Topanga is great, particularly if you ride horses, but you have to live with the threat of brushfires which may burn everything material you hold dear. Some people object to this and it is the reason my sister finally moved after some fifteen years.

As for the Palisades even of my childhood and teen years, the areas north of Sunset where Reagan lived and the Huntington–traditionally considered the Palisades equivalent of the flats of Beverly Hills–were always a different universe from the alphabet streets in the Village or the Highlands. With the steady rise in housing prices since the doubling which occurred between 1974 (when my parents bought) and 1976 and the concomitant trendiness of the Palisades–which became as desirable as Santa Monica north of Montana and Brentwood for industry people–even the Highlands became quite pricey.

But the Highlands are out there, on the way to Malibu, and it has a primitive and remote feel with less impressive architecture than the coveted Huntington, Riviera, or Mandeville Canyon, just on the border of the Palisades and Brentwood. I haven’t been to the Highlands in years, but there were a lot of very ugly and boring medium-to-large houses built in the 1970s and 1980s last I was there. O.J. Simpson’s famed Rockingham estate is just at the beginning of Brentwood, past Paul Revere Junior High, and the Riviera part of the Palisades is roughly equivalent in price. Also, whenever you want to eat out, you are looking at a real drive into Santa Monica, let alone Westwood or Beverly Hills, unless you are content with the limited selections of the Palisades or a further trek out to Malibu.

As my friend followed my directions around the Palisades, he noted I could not be a beach bum but a very good tour guide. Just a few minutes ago on Facebook, he said I had a story about every fourth house. I didn’t realize any of this until I made friends on Facebook who visited my parents’ house. My boyfriend in Santa Barbara has only been to my parents’ house once in the nearly two years we have known each other. I go to his parents’ house weekly, or I did before spending more weekends in LA. His parents have never met my parents though they have spoken on the phone and his parents have generously invited mine for Thanksgiving.

My family does Christmas at my ex-sister-in-law’s in Moorpark in Ventura County (yes, we are Christmas tree Jews) and J has been there twice. My parents, J and I had dinner at Tra di Noi in Malibu for my 39th birthday.  My parents don’t drive to Santa Barbara to visit. I think my parents have come to SB six times in the sixteen years I have lived there since I moved from New Haven for grad school. Dad thinks Santa Barbara is a place you go to die (meaning retire) and just a “nothing place.”  For many years, I fully concurred but I have come to see the virtues of Santa Barbara, at least half the month. (Santa Barbara Athletic Club is a major selling point of SB, as much as I kvetch about it. It’s very convenient and I could not find a pool nearly this nice within 20 to 25 minutes of my parents’ house.) I could never live there full-time, partly because I have very few friends. I have a boyfriend and that’s pretty much it, though I did meet a very nice group of people, straight and gay, at the Pacific Pride Foundation party last week. I may even meet up with one or two of them.

But on the occasions an LA (or OC) friend comes to visit me in the Palisades, I give him or her a little tour and all this trivia (which seems as natural to me as air) about Hollywood and the lawyers among whom I was raised, gushes out of me effortlessly and with great detail. There must be a way to put some of this to (remunerative) use and I hope someday there will be.

In the meantime, I loved the reunion to which I was headed on Saturday morning when I last blogged and will blog about that tomorrow. Here are a few shots of me from the lunch at the much-changed Westlake (now the middle school of Harvard-Westlake).

At the end of the day on a bench in what used to be the parking lot!

Here I am in what also used to be the parking lot, in front of the new modern structure which took the place of the much prettier “old building” or “administration building.”

The first time I saw the the rebuilt campus, it looked like a very fancy loony bin (1.5K a day sort of place). I don’t know what McLean looks like, the Massachusetts hospital famous to Baby Boomers for James Taylor and “Fire and Rain” and to people of my generation for Susanna Kaysen’s Girl Interrupted, which I read the day it came out, long before the Winona Ryder movie for which Angelina Jolie won a much-deserved Oscar for Best Supporting Actress.

Of course it’s lovely, but compared to the quaint Spanish architecture which fit in with the Bel Air landscape far better (particularly before some of the ghastly McMansions went in), Harvard-Westlake looks quite institutional. It’s nicer than many colleges and the theater, about which I will blog tomorrow, holds 850 with stadium seating, stunning oak or pine on the sides and a sound system for which many an off-Broadway director would commit murder to work in if it were cheap and risk-free.

But it isn’t the school I attended, minus the “old” classroom building, which has been renamed Reynolds Hall for Nathan Reynolds, the beloved headmaster since the late 1960s, who was there this weekend. The structure is now mainly devoted to art and teachers’ offices. Room 311–the fiefdom of our uber-liberal debate coach King Schofield–has recently been converted into a computer lab, which is so depressing I can hardly articulate it. The Marshall Center for Arts and Athletics is now simply the Marshall Center (for Garry Marshall, whose girls attended Westlake, and who donated the money for what still holds an auditorium far nicer than any public school I have ever seen in my life).  They have not redone the Olympic-sized pool and the courts and lockers are still quite nice by any normal standard. But they now have on what used to be called the “upper lawn,” a small putting green and batting cage. The idea of a batting cage at Westlake School for Girls is beyond bizarre.

Over lunch, a woman with whom I reconnected at the Yale event at UCLA for kids (“Tour of the Solar System”) confessed to me in a slightly conspiratorial and guilty tone, “I’m not crazy about the architecture.” It grows on you. This was my second year at the reunion lunch and the shock was considerably less than last year. But it isn’t Westlake School for Girls anymore. It’s a strange though impressive institution called Harvard-Westlake.

Happy Monday!

P.S. Thanks to my friend, Mark, for inspiring this blog. He generously drove up from south of LAX to pick me up. Here we are outside the Cottage (CVS in the background, formerly Long’s Drugs and before that, Sav-On Drugs). 

Share
Posted in Lifestyle, Uncategorized, Westlake School For Girls | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Miscellaneous Wrap-Up of Week: Montecito Aesthetics Institute, Artistic Nails, Pacific Pride Foundation Rooftop Mixer on Day of Obama Gay Marriage Announcement, John Cusack and Pico Iyer This Week, Westlake School for Girls Reunion Lunch Today….

 

Westlake School for Girls, now Harvard-Westlake. 700 North Faring Road (Bel Air, CA). Site of today's alumni lunch.

What an exciting week this will be in our little sleepy beach town my last week before New York! Unfortunately (but not surprisingly), no one organizes anything here and the Lobero Theater’s people didn’t talk to the UCSB Arts and Lectures people so John Cusack will be speaking at Campbell Hall on Wednesday, May 16th, the same night Pico Iyer gives a talk at the Lobero. The Lobero isn’t connected to UCSB Arts and Lectures–the cultural saving grace of this town–but given the Granada does, one would have thought in a town with limited entertain options a call or two might have been made.

Decisions, decisions! Since I have already seen Pico Iyer speak, albeit two decades ago, at a Master’s Tea at Yale with just 40 or 50 other people and can read his book (I may have to drive to Chaucer’s even with a stomach ache to pick it up tonight) and John Cusack rarely gives interviews, I am going to go with the Cusack if tickets are still available.

I agree with the Independent that Cusack is one of my generation’s great character actors. He embraces and embodies the advice of Michael Dorsey in Tootsie, Dustin Hoffman’s neurotic, brilliant, cross-dressing protagonist: ”You gotta work. 90% unemployment when I started acting, 90% unemployment when all my friends started acting, but you gotta find work.”

Of course, for Cusack after Say Anything, it’s been a blessed, even and smooth ride. But he comes from a thespian family and his work ethic matches his talent. You also don’t hear about him in the tabloids and I admire his sister Ann’s work as well. I adored Grosse Pointe Blank and still listen to the soundtrack. High Fidelity, three years later in 2000, was spectacular, though one could argue he was still on some level playing himself, something which cannot be said of Being John Malkovich.

George Clooney came up on a thread yesterday. Like most women, I adore him. I loved Up in the Air and The Descendants. Ides of March was the most infuriating movie ever and I walked out for the 20 minutes I wanted to shoot someone (actually, the writer) for marring four stellar performances by Clooney, Ryan Gosling, Philip Seymour Hoffman and Paul Giamatti with what could only be characterized as a retarded plot device: the abortion drama of Evan Rachel Wood’s character.

A drop-dead gorgeous daughter of the Democratic National Committee chair should not have trouble finding 900 dollars for an abortion, first of all. I get she couldn’t go to her Catholic daddy for 900 bucks, but give me a break. She has no money in her checking account? She has no credit card on which she can take a 900 dollar advance? She can’t get 200 from four separate guys or gal pals? Ridiculous. And has she never heard of Planned Parenthood, which is not close to 900 dollars for poor women or those with no access to funds? Worse, the campaign manager drives her to the clinic? It was all so preposterous and I saw the suicide coming a mile away. It was moronic and manipulative so I went out to smoke for 20 minutes before coming back inside to see the ending.

Whatever you think of Clooney’s politics, he is a man’s man and unspeakably sexy and handsome. I even liked him in the dopey romantic comedy in the early 1990s with Michelle Pfeiffer and Charles Durning, One Fine Day. ER was never the same after he left though I didn’t have too much use for Julianna Marguiles’ character. I thought Laura Innes, the lesbian surgeon and ER director, was a great addition to the show and Alex Kingston, the Brit, helped compensate for Clooney’s loss.

Once Mark Green (Anthony Edwards) died, the show was not of interest to me and I will go to the death arguing that Grey’s Anatomy is ten times the show, on the score of writing, acting and music, that ER was at its height. In fact, I will take St. Elsewhere and Chicago Hope over ER. It was a good solid drama but it was not a revolutionary, innovative or spectacular drama. I knew Michael Crichton from the gym and Main Street Dance and Exercise, where I was his wife Anne-Marie’s stretch-and-tone teacher. I liked Michael very much and was sad to learn of his death. He was a Harvard man, both undergrad and med, and he teased me incessantly about having selected “the wrong school.” I do realize the camera work was innovative. But in terms of human relationship, it didn’t hold a candle to Grey’s Anatomy. It was also less interesting on a medical level because it was ER medicine not surgery in the main, with all the complexity of neuro and cardio cases.

I wrote on FB that I do not understand celebrity crushes on anyone my age or younger, with one notable exception: Ryan Gosling. He is an Adonis with attitude, edge and heart. He is hardly human. So Gosling doesn’t count. But in discussing another Clooney movie I adore–Michael Clayton (2007)–I mentioned I had never seen the Departed, in spite of my love of all things Scorsese and DeNiro. It came out in my coma years and I never rented it. But I don’t get Leonardo di Caprio at all. He’s not that cute and he’s not sexy at all in my view.  He doesn’t exude brilliance or even high intelligence, which I generally have to have to fall in love both in real life and fantasy. The only actors under 50 on whom I have celebrity crushes: Adrien Brody, Ed Norton (Yale ’88) and John Cusack (who is pushing 50 hard). As much as Iyer’s new book interests me, therefore, I am going to go to the Cusack lecture at UCSB.

Iyer’s perennial theme is cosmopolitanism, what it means to be a nomadic being, a citizen of the world. I remember him from his Time days and it was pure coincidence that he was at a Master’s Tea the day Mom came to visit me in New Haven. She didn’t come a lot and I think it was in Davenport College but I might be wrong. Iyer was born and raised in England and came to Santa Barbara at 8. Of course, I find it amusing that at 8 he felt the town was not for him and went back to be schooled in England. He felt that the “foment” of 1960s Santa Barbara was working against all that England had thus far taught him and would teach him in the future. In his local interview, he goes so far as to say that England is relatively unchanged since the Renaissance! But Dyer returned to Santa Barbara for summer vacations and thus on some level a local. I will say more about Iyer and his book tonight or tomorrow but I am jamming to get ready for the event at my high school. I cannot believe it has been a year since the last reunion lunch. I was on crutches!

Victorian Chick at Westlake alum lunch, 2011.

Last year, I blogged about a “networking pedicure” with Palisades Harvard-Westlake girls getting ready for prom at Rosie and Nails. Yes, that’s what it’s called. It’s an Asian nail salon in the Palisades with non-Asian salon pricing and it’s not “Rosie’s Nails”; it’s “Rosie and Nails.” Perhaps they got the sign wrong back when it was on Swarthmore or Via de La Paz and moved to Sunset, next to the tiny Yogaworks across from Bank of America. It has always cracked me up, though, when I write a check there (no credit cards) that it’s “Rosie and Nails,” as though you are paying for Rosie herself. The implication here of a commercial sexual transaction is not intentional, but I can’t help smiling.

In preparation for today, I got the first business cards of my life. I plan to have very nice glossy business cards when I go to New York a week from today (I can’t believe it!) for Victorian Chick, as people ask me for one when I am in the city and talking about my blog. These are utilitarian but I think quite nice, though black and white and not raised or engraved. Best of all I got this leather case with which I am quite in love, black with a V inside.

Holder for business cards. Love this thing, fits credit card and driver's license, hypothetically speaking of course.

This is pure accident but I love this thing and it fits a credit card or a driver’s license (not that I have the actual card itself,  though I found an application for a duplicate in my glove compartment which I had bought before the Seattle wedding in October when I feared my passport was gone and then never completed upon finding the passport).

The cards, which I won’t put on the blog since they include my phone number and email address, simple have my name in bold at the top. Under this, they say: “English and Writing Tutor. Yale B.A. Phi Beta Kappa, M.A., U.C.S.B. M.A, Ph.D. Candidate.” And then my phone number and email. Simple and clean and I don’t know why but they make me so happy!

I also found, after a couple years of not having a place in Santa Barbara for nails, a salon I really like in Paseo Nuevo Mall: Artistic Nails. Its location is the only downside. I really avoid the mall unless coming to meet J after work for dinner or a drink. The parking structure is fine and it’s not the money. I just prefer to shop and eat anywhere I don’t have to have a parking ticket and search a structure for a spot. Other than that, it’s perfect.

I will write a review on Yelp because there were some unjust and scathing reviews. It’s reasonably-priced and the service is great. A different person did my pedicure and my gel manicure–French tip–and both look perfect. They are fast and the music is fine. Most Santa Barbara nail salons, Asian or not, play 101.7 K-Lite, the station where that syrupy Delilah dishes out her inspirational drivel and it makes me nuts. Also the chattering at some salons bothers me and this one is free from all of these irritations.

I had a coupon from the Independent so my French tip gel manicure (you always pay more for French) and my French tip pedicure (regular, not gels, with a nice little foot and calf massage and various oils): 49 dollars before tip. This is very good. Today, I will wear a light blue Banana Republic top over some jeans I haven’t fit into for some months but wore last night. I didn’t realize till writing on Facebook that I wore the same jeans last year with a different top but I like the baby blue with the Brighton choker I got for my cousin’s wedding in Seattle last October.

I am getting a bit of a slow start. I love the Perlane. Love, love, love. And for the first time I got 6 units of Botox–60 bucks–to get rid of a few little lines under the eye and I am wowed by the results. I do Dysport instead of Botox which lasts half the time and hurts much more, for my forehead. I went 8 or 9 months between Dysport injections and 11 months between this Perlane (May 1st) and the prior one (June 5th).

With no makeup at all, I am so thrilled with my skin and its youthful appearance.  I did buy some Hydroquinone to get rid of my unwanted recent freckles about 4 months ago (which I can’t find and didn’t start because of they sort of scared me at Evolutions about never being in the sun without sunscreen once you start this). I never had very many but the last 18 months, I have developed quite a few on my nose. Some people think it is cute. I am not one of them and don’t like how it looks without some powder or cover-up.  With makeup, I am astonished by the difference from the treatments this last week and J gasped when he first saw me with my new cover-up, a tinted moisturizer by PUR. I bought it in Orange County at Alta and just learned we now have an Alta in Goleta.

I love tumbling out of bed, putting on PUR, mascara, and lip gloss and feeling I actually did something to make myself presentable when in reality, I spent all of 3 minutes. This reminds me: I must hit CVS for eyeliner (borrowed some liquid from my aunt and now I am hooked, though FB friends have recommended some Sephora liner which is halfway between liquid and pencil).

Oddly, between last night and this morning, I developed some puffiness under the left eye and will call Dr. Chang of Montecito Institute from LA. I will be going to Dr. Chang from now on.  I love Dr. Perkins and if I ever need a bit of filler in the nose (the non-surgical way of helping a nose or fixing a botched nose job once a year) I’ll go back to him as he is a renowned plastic surgeon.  But if it’s just filler on eyes and other parts of the face other than the nose, I can’t afford to pass up Living Social deals for Dr. Chang. I got two syringes of Perlane for the price of one (1300 value for 650) at Montecito Aesthetics Institute and he did a great job.

I will close with a couple pictures from Pacific Pride Foundation Canary rooftop mixer at which I got to meet Hannah-Beth Jackson and her wonderful, talented husband Charles Eskin. He is a judge now but studied with Lee Strasberg in New York and went to UCLA with my mother. They are both UCLA Law 1965 and Hannah-Beth is one of the only political candidates to whom my mother gives money. I had a ball talking to them and it was another sheer coincidence (my business card holder with a V and Mom’s visit on the day of Iyer’s talk at Yale twenty years ago being the others) that Obama got off his ass about gay marriage the night of this mixer, planned for PPF weeks earlier. Whether he did it out of conviction or political expediency, I don’t give a shit.

No, it’s not the be all and end all of political issues. But if you care about AIDS and the LGBT community, it’s a cause for celebration and I’m not that concerned about the deep ideological significance that my smarter conservative friends discussed on Facebook ALL week relative to government sanction of marriage (gay or straight). Look, one can make the argument that government doesn’t need to be in the marriage business at all. And my North Carolina friend, a conservative with libertarian leanings, writes cogently and at great length about this.

People tease me for my marathon comments. My friend Deb can write 1500 words on breastfeeding, rigorously analyzing the medicine and sociology of breastfeeding. I am not alone among ex-English or literature major friends! But anyone who says it is “devoid of meaning” to have the POTUS come out and endorse same sex marriage doesn’t know very many gay people. Sure, you have those odd gay Republicans. Overall, in urban centers where they gay population is highest, people are happy. That makes me happy. Period the end.

So, here I am happy with two friends (well one I just met), holding Pride Wine. It’s a Chardonnay for 20 dollars and proceeds from wine sales benefit Pacific Pride Foundation where I drove for the AIDS food pantry in 2009.

Victorian Chick at Canary Hotel, rooftop mixer for Pacific Pride Foundation on the day Obama finally embraced same sex marriage/marriage equality. Whether he did so out of conviction or political expediency, I don't give a shit. I am happy.

Tomorrow of course is Mother’s Day and we will do a small brunch, just my parents and Aunt Suzy and me. I changed my profile picture in honor of Mother’s Day. This is my favorite childhood picture of me and Mom. She is assistant DA of LA here, early in 1977.

Victorian Chick at 5, 1977. Mom is 37. Full-on 1970s regalia.

Happy Saturday!

Share
Posted in Family, Fashion, Health & Beauty, Lifestyle, Politics, School, Uncategorized, Westlake School For Girls | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pictures and Video of Emma, the Labrador Retriever Who Does Not Retrieve and Reflection on Fabricated Facebook Lives and the Freedoms of Victorian Chick

Victorian Chick and "her" girl, Emma at Miramar beach.

 

It feels like summer. I’m in a green mermaid sheer maxi-dress I bought as a cover up for the Dominican Republic in the summer of 2010. I hadn’t been out of the country in 17 years and I had never been to the Caribbean. It was a wonderful 6 days of swimming, laughing, eating and drinking. Those all-inclusive places are really a bargain and since I went during hurricane season, it was even cheaper. We had almost no rain and it was a really great week, in spite of losing to a large young Dominican woman, age 19, in the bikini contest during the final round. For the rest of the vacation, couples were coming up to me and my boyfriend saying, “You’re number 9! You were robbed!”  In fact, there was a huge influx of her local friends so I lost in the “applause” meter and finished in second place.

My then-boyfriend took a video and accidentally erased it. The first round was a walk in a sundress on the runway they erect on the beach weekly. The second was in a bikini, dancing and sitting on a stool. I wore a fabulous dress which was the casualty of the Hilma toss of 2011, bought at my sister’s hair salon. I miss this dress!

For round one of Dominican Republic bikini contest, 2010.

The third and final round is a run-off between the two contestants with the highest applause rating for the first two rounds. This is merely a repeat of round two. I did the splits and yoga/ballet while someone with a Kardashian build but even bigger perhaps, did ass-shaking stripper moves. Hers clearly was the right approach.

I was only miffed he lost the video as he was a competent person and successful venture capitalist who didn’t make such mistakes, unlike me, whom he called his “sweet and useless creature” and “absentminded, almost professor”!  But it was great fun and with Living Social (I’m a huge fan), I’ll be on the lookout for 2013 to go back. The prize was pathetic: 25 minute massage, an MP3 of reggae (not a fan) and a bottle of run. The nine losers all got the rum, Brugal, so I was not too distressed. I was happy the contest was day 2 of the vacation so I could let go after that!

I just got a note on Facebook from a new friend who had read my less than flattering blog on UCSB’s Cultural Studies department. I posted a few beautiful lingerie shots (see below), and he wrote, “A man can learn things on this FB page which he cannot encounter anywhere else.” High praise!  Sometimes women on FB can be very rude, catty, jealous and petty. In fact, I have met some of my dearest friends because when Greg Hilton posted a provocative but clothed shot of me lounging in a Cosabella nightgown on the white my boyfriend was trying to sell on Craigslist, a few conservative women were horrified by their conservative counterparts’ comments. The two posts on Greg Hilton’s page inspired some 400 comments en toto.

A nice bra I posted. Probably 100 or so. I won't wear cheap lingerie so I end up wearing very little at all

I once had a nutty art dealer from New England undergo a mini-aneurysm on my wall. We had just become friends, not through my political circle of friends but through an art circle I became involved with about 1.5 years ago. She is, however, a conservative who didn’t used to be and converts tend to be suspect much–though not all–of the time. Her big thing is that she won’t buy the New York Times. Well, I am sure the Sulzbergers will all be applying for food stamps and welfare in no time because of this bold, courageous move on the part of a woman nearing application to the AARP!

I had posted about Priscilla Gilman, a brilliant girl who was taking her Orals at Yale when I was graduating from college. She and her husband were both grad students and then went on to teach at prestigious colleges. She’s out of the teaching business now, writing on parenting for various publications, as well as touring to discuss her book, The Anti-Romantic Child: Unexpected Joy.

Priscilla and I went to the same gym in New Haven, before Payne Whitney was renovated and became an acceptable place for non-athletes to work out. I remember people saying it was the second largest gym in the free world and it did sort of look like a Russian gulag, though not as much as the science buildings up Prospect Avenue. I forget if it is the chemistry or physics lab, but one has an ominous reddish brown hue and forbidding exterior which, if you didn’t already hate science, would not encourage you to reconsider. But PWG was a dump and even with shower shoes, the bathroom and steam room were slightly frightening. The cardio machines were antiquated and coming from LA, I literally shuddered the first time I walked in to work out.

This happened well over a year ago, before I had read about her work on autism and other developmental disorders. One son has hyperlexia, a fairly serious social disorder which is accompanied by an acute, advanced reading ability. By two or three, her son could spell and read five syllable words. Her other son is dyslexic and she has written recently in Huffington Post about the challenges of parenting two such vastly different children. But I merely wrote that it is always a bit strange to read about someone in your own field from college who succeeded where you failed. Priscilla was a Brearly girl, K to 12, raised on the Upper East Side, the daughter of the prominent theater professor at Yale, as well as a playwright and author, Richard Gilman. We came from and inhabited similar worlds, albeit 3000 miles apart. And her dissertation chair was the great Romanticist Paul Fry, my senior seminar professor.

I have since then evolved to a quite different position about my defunct academic career. I didn’t regret things 18 months ago but since the blog, my expanded travels, and my vastly deepened friendships, I have come to cherish my freedom. Yes, I would like to be writing more for money and hope that will come to pass. In a few years, I will publish a memoir about my LA industry childhood as the daughter of prominent attorneys, Yale, UCSB, my decade of depression and my redemption through social networking. I had a best friend who turned things around for me but it wasn’t until 2010 with Facebook and in 2011 with my blog that things really shifted for me. But for now, I have ultimate freedom. I have to be careful about money, but my only responsibility is to my father, who wants me there about 10 days a month, both for companionship and schlepping. With Mom three months into retirement, though she plans to teach law school part time, the schlepping responsibilities are much diminished.

This summer I will be on the East Coast twice. On May 19th, I fly into Newark to stay with my FB sister, a lawyer and social worker with a darling son, 5 years old. I may go up to the Cape for Memorial Day to be with my unofficial uncle/family friend and his best couple friends. Later in the summer, I will go to the city for a one-week dance intensive at Luigi Jazz Dance Centre, five to six hours a day for six days.  After that, I’ll go up and spend some real time at the Cape, reading at the little beach of my friend’s club. It will be a beautiful summer of friends, dance, culture, and New York. I will also have little CA jaunts, one to San Diego and another to San Francisco/Auburn.

A professor generally does have the summer off. But I travel all year long and come and go as I please and that freedom is precious. It’s also likely why sometimes I get these psychotic women on Facebook who gossip, spread rumors and say vicious things. I am hardly shy and post fun and sexy pictures, along with goofy Homeless Chic albums with lots of food and pets. The thing about “headlights” has become a running gag, a kind of Victorian Chick trademark.  Most uber-educated women, particularly 10 to 15 years earlier, are very liberal and often uptight feminists who they to efface any trace of femininity or sexuality. I’m not like that. I also swear like Denis Leary and I don’t suffer fools gladly, “retarded” being a favorite word of mine in frequent circulation in Rescue Me, not of course to describe actually retarded people, but merely very stupid ones.

Not many women of 40 enjoy this kind of freedom, having never “made it” professionally. I’m very close to my parents. I have a loving and tolerant boyfriend. I have absolutely amazing friends, both on and off Facebook (most of the ones off Facebook started online). My boyfriend has the most phenomenal pets, Ollie the lab and Emma the Norwegian forest cat. And I’m free to read, write, lunch, swim, travel, and chat to my heart’s content.

My life is relatively easy, peaceful, and stress-free. It was not always thus, though with the exception of one or two years in all my life, I have never had to worry about money (rent, food, insurance, car, travel, moderate shopping etc.) And one of my very good friends said to me, when she heard of some of the “Victoria made up her life” comments, “Well, if she did she sure did a good job of it! And she is something of a masochist.”

This prompted J to say, quite correctly, “Who the fuck would make up your life? Prune missions with your father of 87, break-ins to a used Saab from 2007 with broken a/c. If you’re going to fabricate a life, you talk about chartered planes to St. Bart’s, not the search for a 350 RT ticket to New  York on Orbitz!” Quite so.

Still, I do at times long for life in the academy. I did enjoy teaching (at times, depending upon the material and the students that quarter). I love to write and I still don’t write the kinds of things I used to. I think I am strong enough to write 20-page journal articles, not that most people care about anything an ABD from 2001 has to say, not in a refereed journal at any rate. But I don’t push myself into those treacherous waters. Someone had promised to help me with a monograph of 40,000 words, dumbed down for a more mainstream rather than professorial/professional audience but that didn’t work out and he withdrew–quite painfully–all his promises of professional assistance.

But even at its best, life in the academy is grueling, exhausting, and competitive. It is gut-wrenching to produce original (philosophical) work of which you are proud, particularly when your tenure depends upon it. And tenure is harder to achieve than ever before. As I have written previously on Victorian Chick, bouncing around the community or state college systems in states you wouldn’t want to spend a month, much less a decade, is hardly glamorous or fulfilling.

But when I saw all that Priscilla had accomplished (I don’t envy anyone for having kids, just not something I wanted except in a passing sort of way and only under the most stringent financial conditions imaginable which I didn’t– and still don’t–have), I did feel a slight pang. I was overjoyed for her success, though at the time I didn’t realize she had dropped out of the academy, after brief stints at Yale and Vassar, to raise kids and use her education in other ways, none of which frankly appeal to me even a little bit. The best part of being a professor at a great school is living the life of the mind, surrounded by like-minded people doing the same.

I cannot imagine reaching the pinnacle of that and then just chucking it all. I remember so well going to my professor’s house in Westlake in 1997 for an independent study meeting on Daniel Deronda. Kay Young did her dissertation at Harvard with Stanley Cavell and Phil Fisher (philosophy/lit crossover project) and married a man at Harvard Med who had also been there for undergrad. They had one son, about two, whom they saddled with the improbable name Dashiell Fellini Saber-Young. Kay is into film, like her mentor Stanley whom she regards as a second father, which explains the Fellini. She also adores Hammett, hence Dashiell, whom they call Dash.

I arrived on time and they were both–this Harvard-trained neurosurgeon now at UCLA and a Harvard English Ph.D. now at UCSB–cleaning up prodigious amounts of puke. They looked pale and exhausted. She smiled, “Oh, it’s a glam life we live!” I do realize that eventually, the puke and the poop phases of life come to an end. But the noise part goes on a long time and if you have two, I am told that only semi-tyrants like my father can stop siblings from fighting.  (Dad never ever hit his children but his mere presence enforced quiet and discouraged even inconvenience.)

I am further told that siblings learn to negotiate and compromise by bickering. I couldn’t take that. My view is that if I, hypothetically, have done something fundamentally unjust which creates a legitimate grievance between siblings, I am happy to correct that and admit my wrongdoing. But if there is no real point to the dispute, I don’t want to hear about it and that’s why I wouldn’t have kids unless I could afford a house big enough (in a city I like) for a big, sound-proofed basement. And even if my conditions for childrearing had been met, I would have had only one.

Even if the noise part of kids can be controlled or mitigated somewhat, the worry part never ends. My father still worries about his three children, aged 40, 51, and 58. It’s a big, big deal and I have never understood how so many undertake it mindlessly, thinking it’s just a natural course of events which sort of just works out. Even in financially secure families, it doesn’t just “work out” and turn out with happily ever afters, lives devoid of trauma or drama. I have extremely high standards when it comes to how much stress I am willing to tolerate (read: little to none).

Certainly, having had a life in part of crippling depression, I don’t want so much as to be hassled in my life now. If something is unpleasant, I get rid of it. I don’t have any desire for stress or life problems or anxiety or difficulty. I’m like a scholarly version of Cyndi Lauper’s 1980s hero: “I just wanna have fun.” Fun includes intellectual and physical discipline and engagement and helping others in whatever small way I can (driving for a food pantry or becoming an “angel” in a hospice who sits with people who have no one in their last days). It doesn’t mean shopping endlessly. It does mean not having to worry about anyone’s emotional or mental problems or issues ever again. Been there, done that.

I won’t date a man with serious problems, psychological or substance-related.  I listen quite a bit to the problems of friends, people with very difficult lives, but they don’t expect me to be responsible for their problems. That is the major distinction between a person whose life is hell who can nevertheless be a friend and a person whose life is hell and cannot. I also don’t want to worry about my kid or kids getting in to college, paying for college, or finding a way to support themselves in life. I don’t want to be tied down to one geographical location, nor do I wish to be responsible for the care and feeding of a dependent.

The kid part, then, of Priscilla’s story was not at all a source of longing for me. But certainly, a girl much like me who became a professor, did create a mild–not severe–pang.  So this nut job art dealer in her 60s, who had started in with the “XOXO baby doll, love you girlfriend” after a few days of FB friendship, went batshit on my wall post about Priscilla. She claimed I was a high school dropout who had invented my life. I never went to any schools, much less Yale and UCSB for a doctorate and everything was a lie. This is not the first time someone has said this. In the age of Google, when things are largely verifiable, it’s extraordinary anyone would attempt to deny the existence of a life in the way she did.

And it prompted me to redefine, or at least, to re-articulate my personal identity on Facebook and whatever, by way of a writing career marketing this “Victorian Chick” brand, is underway. First, as I note above, I am not afraid of my femininity or sexuality. I have fun playing with pictures and if more men than women comment, that is okay. I once joked, “Any sensible woman wants to be admired for her tits as well as her brain” and I still feel that way.  I didn’t do anything other than take care of myself and work out all my life, to look as I do. My mother is an attractive woman with a ballet lower body at 72 years old. She has watched her eating all her life and looks better than most 40-yr-olds from the neck down. My father worked out all his life and is in very good shape for 87. So I have fun with fashion and pictures.

I also feel no need to keep secret that I come from a particular world which has shaped my views on money and poverty. Short form: money is good and poverty sucks. Poverty, to me, means lifelong financial struggle. If you are constantly stressing about money, you may not be technically poor, but you might as well be. Defaulting on loans, foreclosing on your house, carrying massive credit card debt and being unable to afford the things you need in life are not happy or ideal conditions. I also make no secret of the fact that I have not had a career in the academy and unlike some who bow out of that world–whether due to depression or simply lack of desire to participate–and have to find something else to do for work, I have not had to do this.

So I make no apologies and while I am deeply gratified by the affection I receive, I don’t give a shit what shallow, stupid, angry, judgmental, boring, catty women unhappy with their lives and looks, think of me. It’s no secret I am pro-choice and pro-gay though I do not and will not use my FB page as a political platform. I am also secular. My FB religious views are “Secular Jew/Anti-Woo Woo,” though I recently saw a description I may have to steal: “Christmas Tree Jew.”  Only a person with serious mental challenges could miss that I am a social liberal. I have strong opinions and no compunctions about expressing them. I am honest to a fault and very trusting of people.

Sometimes I get burned, but I would still rather live my life out in the open air and light than walk around the world suspicious and guarded. I’m strong enough to come back when I’m betrayed and overall, I have worked out a way of walking through this life which works for me. I am vain–any attractive girl who tells you she is not is a liar–and of course I enjoy it when people like or comment, both on my pictures or my status updates about life or culture.

If someone doesn’t want to read me, there are two very simple options: 1) unfriend me, 2) use the cursor on your ticker or feed and skip over my posts which bore you or skip them altogether. Anyone who would be overwhelmed by the frequency of my posts lacks what Friedrich Schiller in Letters on Aesthetic Education of Mankind called a well-developed “form drive.” They are too much creatures of the “sense drive” and have a very weak mental apparatus with which they shape their own realities. Put another way, they lack emotional boundaries if they cannot shut out the life experience of an other. If a person is high-IQ with a lot of education, there is simply no excuse for this emotional weakness, all the more if the person in question has any training in psychology or psychoanalysis. I have a higher tolerance for weakness in the not too bright or educated. I have zero tolerance for weakness or backbiting on the part of the uber-eduated and privileged.

So there is it, my re-formulated personal statement of life! I don’t have to be liked by everyone. If someone doesn’t like me and can’t follow one of those two very simple options, they have bigger fucking problems in life than the loquacious Victorian Chick. It’s never nice when you hear mean things said but truly, I don’t care. While much of my life does revolved around Facebook, I have for the first time since college, friends through family (at least initially through family and then friends of those friends) who live in the world in which I was raised. They are successful, professional, well-to-do and none of them have (or if they do, use) Facebook.  I am perfectly capable of functioning in the real world–or at least my real world of West Los Angeles and New York City–utterly apart from the world of social networking.

Here, then, are the pictures from last night’s pre-dinner beach walk with J and Emma.

My favorite picture of me and J, or one of three since August 2010 when we met

Here’s a link to the video of Emma demonstrating that even a breed isn’t a stereotype…

Labrador Retriever in action…..

Happy Wednesday!

 

Share
Posted in Family, Philosophy, Politics, Travel, Uncategorized, Yale | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Friday Night Bedtime Blog: Preview of Yale Club Family Event at UCLA Planetarium after Physically Rough Week

"Tour of the Solar System": Talk by Yale '06, UCLA Ph.D '12 at UCLA Planetarium

I’m in bed and since I wrote 20 blogs in 30 days, averaging 3000 words, it seems very odd to go three or four days without so much as a peep on the blog itself, though I’ve been plenty busy on both FB pages (personal and Victorian Chick, 3 weeks old today).

I had a wonderful time at the Yale Club event at the adorable and small UCLA Planetarium and I have copious notes and observations, along with pictures of the W Hotel in Westwood. Note: once a month it is open mike at Whiskey Blue (the main bar with bar food as opposed to the small bar at Nine Thirty, the restaurant proper).

If last night’s lineup was any indication of the talent one can expect every month, I will go whenever I’m here on the first Thursday of the month.  I had such fun (though the drive home was eerily like Grand Canyon, except my detour didn’t go through Inglewood and result in a near-death experience with gang members in the Rodney King era). I will say that if Caltrans’ handling of nighttime road construction is at all representative of how CA state government works–with detours to dead ends–we really are in deep shit in my home state!

The Westwood W has free Wifi for bar and restaurant guests, along with cheap parking-7 dollars for 4 hours. The music is vastly improved–Talking Heads, INXS, Cure, Blondie, R.E.M, and Squeeze instead of irritating house/trance/electronica–but this may have been because it was open mike night.  I left my car there, though it ended up being more than 4 hours, to walk to the Mathematical Sciences building and UCLA always makes me happy.

I truly adore the school. Everyone in my family–Mom, Dad, brother, sister, and I–was a Bruin at some point.  Mom went there both for undergrad and law.  Dad started there for undergrad before WWII cut his college career short. He only went to USC Law because UCLA did not yet have a law school. My brother got his bachelors degree there, and I was there in 12th grade and again various summers or semesters in LA during college. I have nothing but the warmest memories of UCLA, not least of which was the one year my mother taught at the law school and got home by 4PM. We’d get to play and eat ice cream before dinner and it was a really fun year for me (1982).

But Perlane Tuesday left me puffy. I don’t think it is Dr. Chang’s fault at Montecito Aesthetics Institute, which I tried because of the Living Social coupon. I have been a loyal customer of Evolutions Medical Spa since 2009, when at 37 I did Botox for the first time. I don’t like Botox half as my as Dysport and only did it twice. My first real filler (Perlane) was December 2010 and my second in June 2011. So this was nearly a year after the last Perlane to minimize under-eye darkness.  Dr Chang, while only 40, is an impressive guy. He is on faculty of Jules Stein at UCLA and has moved into oculo-plastics. He does incredible pro-bono work and has a great bedside manner which impresses, but does not bombard, the patient with technical medical explanations.

But that whole girl problem just sucks sometimes and this time, for the first time ever, I experienced significant back pain, in semi-spasm a day or two as well as simply exhausted.  So I’ve been quite useless this week in an intellectual sense, though useful to Dad. Among other things we embarked on a very serious mission to find bottled prunes as he doesn’t want dried or canned and Gelson’s seems to have discontinued the bottled ones.

As Mom worked on a project of hers (who knows how long retirement will last?), we scoured the markets of Pacific Palisades and I took him to Vons on Sunset/PCH, a store he didn’t think existed. (It used to be Safeway in the old days.) We had our usual fun because my Saab a/c is moody and just when I am about to take it back to have them look at the air filter they cleaned six months ago, it starts working again. It is a 2007 9’3 2.0T I bought used in 2010 with only 26K miles and other than the ignition switch and this little a/c issue, it has been an absolute dream.

Our great prune mission was therefore punctuated by comments like this: “Yes, sirree. That a/c is definitely better. It’s so great on a hot day to feel that blast of cool air.” Or, “Let’s test it out again because we know it’s certainly getting cooler than it was.” When we found the bottles at Vons, they were 33% off so I told him I was indeed the queen of all schleppers and he said, in all seriousness, “I am just happy you’re taking me around. It pays to have kids.” This is of course total bullshit. No kid was every a bigger money pit than I was and I fully recognize this. The private schools alone (K through college), to say nothing of the tens of thousands in analysis and therapy, acupuncture and massage, would pay for countless first class vacations to Europe. But as neurotic as Dad is about money, he doesn’t regard me as a bad investment and he derives immense pleasure from my presence one-third of every month.

Next weekend Mom will be getting an award at Southwestern Law and Dad and I will have a father/daughter date at some restaurant or other (not our usual stable, probably). He joked, “How about Olivera Street?” This is a joke on at least two counts. First, Dad can’t stand Mexican food. Second, Dad doesn’t go downtown, not even for opera or the symphony, unless Mom is going to be honored at a venue like the Dorothy Chandler, in which case he takes a room at the Omni and leave at 1:30 PM so as to avoid the horrible traffic on the 10.  Even though Mom is retired, she doesn’t like leaving him to eat alone (either I am here or Aunt Suzy is, or Hilma stays late and kibbutzes with him while he eats and she’s cleaning up). But somehow leaving him to dine alone on a Saturday is tantamount to a Dickensian level of abandonment and she was genuinely overjoyed that I could be here the night before Mother’s Day.

It turns out I have a Westlake alumni catered lunch at the 700 North Faring Road campus. That is the middle school campus in Bel Air, not the upper school campus on Coldwater which is technically North Hollywood. Now, there is North Hollywood and North Hollywood and this isn’t some horrible place in the Valley. The Lofts at Noho are actually very nice and they have, with the whole designation “Noho,” sought to make the area cool, a kind of Soho of the San Fernando Valley. But I’m sorry, the Bel Air campus in the 90077 zip code, is just about the most expensive real estate in all of Los Angeles. Attending school with the rose gardens and the waterfall was, apart from the education itself, quite extraordinary. It should be a nice lunch and I am amazed a year has passed, since I attended, on crutches, my first reunion event ever.

I haven’t booked my New York trip but will do so in the morning. I am happy to report that my accident claim has finally been settled with Hermes after some six months (a wooden plank fell on my head on 62nd just before Madison, walking from Park). I can’t wait and am missing my friends, the apartment, dance, the park and just the experience of being on East Coast time as stupid as that sounds. I just miss it all, this week in particular, because it’s been as physically trying a week as I can remember in ages with this whole “I still have a uterus and ovaries and that just sucks” problem!

I will post all the pictures from the W and UCLA tomorrow when I blog about these adorable Yale munchkins, all well-behaved, inquisitive, precocious and darling.

Share
Posted in Family, Food & Wine, Uncategorized, Yale | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Gloomy Monday in Santa Barbara Brightened by Lunch at Fresco and Musings on the Literary-Critical Landscape of UCSB English in the 1990s (Another Victorian Chick Ars Critica)

 

Grilled chicken with Provolone, roasted red peppers, avocado and Caesar at Fresco

Gloomy gray days don’t bother me; I find them oddly comforting and generally energizing but not today. I am loving the Trader Joe’s mango Greek Yogurt, 5.5 ounces and 120 calories and will go for a big swim and weights workout at 8 PM tonight. This is the first weekend I’ve been here on a Sunday in weeks, so I don’t have the Wall Street Journal or New York Times book reviews to comb. But I go to LA tomorrow after my Perlane at Montecito Aesthetics Institute, my first time there due to a Living Social coupon, two syringes for the price of one ($650). I got a confirmation about my appointment with Dr. Chang and I am very excited!

I want to pick up the new Christopher Benfrey book at Chaucer’s, our wonderful bookstore my review of which on Philadelphia Junto, along with my writing on Victorian Chick, got me two pieces in The Weekly Standard when the literary editor, Phil Terzian, said he saw much of his young self in my teen incarnation. Benfrey wrote a spectacular work of philosophical criticism about Emily Dickinson in 1984: Emily Dickinson and the Problem of Others. Now he has written a non-traditional memoir about his far-flung family, which is German and Jewish on his father’s side (“scholars, jurists, aesthetes”).

The book is structured around ceramics, a trope through which Benfrey reflects on art and family.  Benfrey’s Dickinson study dwells in the Stanley Cavell philosophy/literature orbit of criticism, the orbit within which I envisioned myself working even before I understood its conceptual underpinnings, much of which took shape in the 1980s during the near cottage industry of Henry James criticism (Martha Nussbaum, Cora Diamond, Frederick Crews, among others). It was the point of departure for my paper on Dickinson for Richard Brodhead (then Dean of Yale, now president of Duke) and UCSB gave me a five year graduate fellowship partly on the strength of that paper. So the book has a special place in my heart. (Who knew it would be such a goddamn disaster?! Of course free graduate school is never bad, even if my parents supplemented the yearly stipends or payment for teaching.)

Stanley Cavell of course moved from philosophy into literary criticism proper, first with his excellent book on Shakespeare (Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare, 1987) and then In Pursuit of the Ordinary: Lines of Skepticism and Romanticism (1988). He ventured into film criticism earlier than that with the wonderful Pursuits of Happiness: The Hollywood Comedy of Remarriage (1981), a book I love (particularly the chapter on It Happened One Night), though I would not at all characterize myself as a Turner Classics fanatic or aficionado like my parents and many Facebook friends.

Cavell, a student of J.L. Austin, the Oxford philosopher who founded ordinary language philosophy, made a name for himself in 1969 with his first book of essays: Must Me We Mean What We Say? The book was the first of many to take skepticism or the problem of other minds as its organizing and central theme. A major topic was the “privacy of pain” and a chief antagonist or at least interlocutor for Cavell was Norman Malcolm. The extent to which one can ever verify, much less enter, the minds of others is a perennial philosophical problem on which one might say Cavell built part of a career. My first mentor and chair at UCSB was Kay Young, whose dissertation at Harvard Cavell directed, along with Phil Fisher in English. As I have said before, the problem with UCSB was never the caliber of professors who taught me.

It was UVA’s Richard Rorty (now dead), I believe, perhaps the most famous American philosopher at the time along with Cavell, who joked that skepticism was for Cavell what logocentrism was for Derrida. Cavell’s most influential book remains the 1979 The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Tragedy, and Morality. I had always thought this Cavell milestone was 1984. 1979 was a huge year in philosophy with Paul Guyer’s Kant and the Claim of Taste, Henry Allison’s Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, and Robert Pippin’s Kant’s Theory of Form and in England, Eva Schaper’s Studies in Kant’s Aesthetics, all bursting onto the scene. For people familiar with literature and philosophy in the last half-century, this brief rehearsal of titles and critics/philosophers explains more succinctly and precisely than anything else perhaps, why the UCSB English department was such an nightmare for me!

Rorty’s Contingency, Irony, Solidarity was my favorite text on the General Theory M.A. reading list (listed under the rubric of “pragmatism”) and I will never forget talking to a girl named Kate (a smart, pretty, but sanctimonious married Midwesterner) about the list which she was reading as well. I said, when I ran into her at a coffee house reading Bocaccio for her Medieval list, how much I loved Rorty and she said that she found it very difficult (and by implication, unpleasant). Yet she had no trouble, I take it, with the difficult and undeniably unpleasant Zizek or Deleuze. Telling.  Honorable mention for unpleasantness goes to Francois Lyotard for his Postmodern Condition and to Horkheimer an Adorno for anything, though when you get Adorno by himself, some of it is tolerable. Horkheimer is never tolerable.

Kate came to work with Carol Pasternak, a wonderful, tenured Jewish professor from the Palisades and quite a bit more traditional than Louise, who taught Old English, history of the English language and Beowulf. But Kate was a Lacanian and I think she worked more with Louise Fradenberg, our other famous Medievalist.  I was told by Roze’s boyfriend (both about four years ahead of me) that Louise died her blonde hair partly green in 1996 for a brief period and walked around South Hall with a walkman and headset. Very odd but brilliant lady.

Louise, who eventually changed her name to Aranye as some sort of declaration of her newfound identification with her Jewish heritage (again, odd as she didn’t seem very religious) is a hardcore Lacanian. In fact she is best friends with Julie Carlson, my brilliant ex-chair who hates me.  She drives a Volvo station wagon with a “Question Reality” bumper sticker, which I find slightly irritating for a tenured professor of English. Of course she’s a staunch liberal but that’s not the annoying part. And I’m just as socially liberal–gays and abortion–as everyone else in the department. That was never the problem; the problem was the insistence that literature be infected (my word) or imbued (their word, if they thought long enough to identify it) with political assumptions, frameworks, or ideologies.

N.B: any book of criticism which includes “ideology” (or “patriarchy” for that matter) in the title is not a book I’m going to enjoy.  None is worse than Terry Eagleton’s Ideology of the Aesthetic. Eagleton is a British Marxist and Phil Terzian and I were quite in agreement about all these matters which is partly why, I think, in spite of being a registered Democrat, I fit right in at The Weekly Standard, at least in the back section (“Books and Arts”).

I was not the only (but certainly one of the few) to note the irony of one of our Marxist professors living in Montecito, though he was actually a traditional (and Irish) scholar with a wonderful spirit. (At least Alycee was relatively poor!) I wish I had taught for Enda Duffy, however, or taken his course on modernism which I never studied in a seminar, just individual modernist texts in more niche seminars. Enda was a professor who could teach a straight survey without pushing his particular theoretical orientation and commitments and I would have learned a lot, plus he was just a really kind man.

I don’t know that Louise would characterize herself as a Marxist critic but certainly she was attracted to all that French shit, as I thought of it, very far to the left on the theory spectrum.  But the bumper sticker struck me as stupid. First of all, other than a decal from one’s college or graduate/professional school, I don’t like bumper stickers period.  And hers was just so reductive and cloying, the sort of “Simplify” bullshit one sees at our pretentious, overpriced knockoff of Whole Foods which was the only game in town before 2009. (We are about to get a Fresh and Easy on Milpas which is lovely.) I find it absurd and a bit unseemly that a professor armed with the theory and philosophy background Louise is, had a bumper sticker a crunchy granola yoga vegan in tie dye might stick on an old VW bug or God forbid, a van.

I saw Louise, who looked older but not that much different, at the vet last year when I took Emma in for what turned out to be harmless but sounded ominous: reverse sneezing. She didn’t recognize me but she’s very socially awkward. I’m not saying she has Asperger’s but she’s just not a friendly person. I forget what kind of dog she has but it wasn’t all that cute either, and I’m not just saying that because Emma is like a show lab (and the mommy of two AKC champions)!

Danny Karlin, however, a Victorianist and one of the world’s foremost scholars of Browning, got to know Louise at University College London around 1996 I think, when she was there for a quarter. He said she is very nice once you get to know her though she’s heavily into theory which he said in his wonderfully British way, was “not his bag.” Danny and I lost track of one another but his five person seminar on Victorian poetry as a visiting professor was a highlight of my time at UCSB, with no mean or irritating grad students and thus a seminar I actually looked forward to attending.

I can think of only one other seminar about which I felt that way. Even Elizabeth Cook’s Restoration and 18th-century Women Writers, a course whose content I adored (plus she’s amazing and brilliant both personally and intellectually), was often unpleasant for me, though not as bad as Alycee Lane’s Black Political Fiction, which I took only to fulfill a distributional requirement. Robert and David were both in that class and I was moved to tears twice. Bob Erikson’s 18th-century seminar was no better and yet again I had to endure that ill-tempered Alabaman.

Alycee, a tall, attractive, lesbian, African-American Marxist and very good basketball player, is gone both from UCSB and the academy. She went to law school and now practices in the Bay Area. She was okay though. She knew we inhabited different universes but she read and graded my 25-page seminar paper on the ethical/aesthetic intersections of Chester Himes’ Lonely Crusade fairly and I got an A in the class even though I didn’t write something ideologically compatible with most of the theoretical readings she assigned. As a person, she was affable enough.

My second year of the Masters, I knew a girl named Denee, very smart, who came here from Arizona State with a Masters (her thesis was on Keats and “Le Belle Dame Sans Merci”). She TA’d an upper division Chaucer seminar for Louise (along with Kate and Robert, that odious bald Alabaman I’ve mentioned before, who came from money and whose parents sent him to the military to make him less odious–which didn’t work at all by the way). Louise did more Zizek than Canterbury Tales, a fact which would no doubt sicken my friend and scholar neighbor in Pacific Palisades, Clare Spark. She was also big on Deleuze and Guattari.

Denee was one of the few girls in the department I liked and had I been in less pain or a slightly better place, I think we would have been social friends. We taught Milton together the spring of 1998 for the late Richard Helgerson (a major New Historicist, along with Stephen Greenblatt, Louis Montrose etc), the quarter we both took the M.A. exam and the pressure of that quarter was overwhelming. Unfortunately for me, Robert, at UCSB to study with the great Richard Helgerson and a straight up New Historicist but one of the smarter kids in my year (disproving the theory that great or potentially great literary scholars are imbued with an essential humanity) was also TAing for Richard that quarter.

Robert actually behaved slightly better than normal and we didn’t have many TA meetings so I didn’t have to deal with him much. Kate and Robert got on swimmingly (not romantically,  as she had a cool young husband who had followed her after her Masters to UCSB) because Robert respected her and kept the asshole quotient to a minimum. Robert despised me as the rich bitch from Yale and would go on and on about his poverty, all the while spending God knows how much on coffee and espresso. He also wore a Rolex so really he was pissed his parents were stingy and withholding and that mine were generous and supportive, even when we didn’t get along or speak. Maybe the apple didn’t fall far from the tree and his parents were just awful. But maybe, just maybe, they were financially withholding because he was a complete dick. I’m going to go with the second option but as I said, there is a possibility option one was the source of his ill humor.

Robert wasn’t all that nice to the sweet Jewish Wellesley girl a year ahead of us who roomed with his uber-uptight, mousy but very fit girlfriend with a tight bun from University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee. But she was not exactly svelte and I always thought that if I had been a large girl, who wore no makeup and dressed for shit, I would have fared better in the department.  The incoming graduate class of 1996 was just so dreadful and snotty. I’m not even getting to the militant heavy lesbian with combat boots who had a sense of humor and actually came to study at my apartment once. I don’t know why but after that one study date, she decided I was the enemy and rude to me forever after. From Baltimore, she came with a Masters and grew progressively more militant as the years progressed, both about feminism and sexual orientation issues.

As usual, this turned into a longer rumination than I had intended and I will close with pictures of Fresco, a restaurant I just love in the Five Points mall. I used to go in the late 1990s and then not again till last year as that was one of the areas of Santa Barbara “haunted” by miserable grad student memories. Truthfully, about 90% of Santa Barbara was haunted for me for about seven years. It’s 25 years old and I would love it even if it didn’t have free corkage. You order at the counter, which keeps food worthy of a fine dining restaurant quite reasonable. The only thing I don’t like is the pizza and it’s closer to “faggy” than traditional pizza (which I am allowed to say as I know gay men who say this also and I’m as pro-gay as they come).  The Margherita is oily and boring.

My favorite new dish is the grilled chicken sandwich on sourdough with Provolone, avocado and roasted bell peppers. Fresco has a great Caesar which could only be improved by anchovies. The soups are all excellent, as are the desserts, including the famous berry pie with fresh whipped cream. I have not tried many of the desserts but all look wonderful. They have giant cupcakes which can serve as dessert for three and which I have occasionally brought my father, who lives for treats! (Come to think of it, this makes him a lot like Emma, J’s lab, though Dad is more temperamental than this angelic creature!)

Once or twice a week there is live acoustic music and it’s a large family-friendly restaurant which will please parents with sophisticated palates without breaking their budget (or creating the stress of bringing small children to a fine dining restaurant which takes an hour or more to eat). A shot of the second room (where WiFi reception is much stronger).

Some of the local, rotating art at Fresco in April, 2012.

 

 

I prefer the tables to the booths which are so upright I feel like I’m almost leaning forward as I eat. The tables are closer together but far more comfortable.

 

A view of the sandwich from the side.

Half of grilled chicken sandwich

Happy Monday!

Share
Posted in Food & Wine, Lifestyle, Literature, Philosophy, School, UCSB, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ducati Biker Chick by Night, Food Blogger in Bridesmaids’ Dress by Day (Blush SB Brunch)

At Blush SB for Best Brunch in SB (Quality and Value)

 

I am so happy to be back at the pool: a blissful 55 minutes followed by a steam, no weights as I forgot clothes in car and was too lazy to go get sweats which wouldn’t have been laundered anyway. I thought this would be a more peaceful place to blog than J’s condo, where a playdate with two second grade boys is underway but with the club so empty, the sound of the racquetball game is less than peaceful. I think I will try to play some music on Macbook Pro quietly and see if anyone minds.

It has been a fun weekend. Last night we went to a party at Ducati of Santa Barbara a friend of J’s throws every year.  Last year, I was on crutches and still in LA following the fall at the American Philosophical Association conference in San Diego. The high point of the evening was unquestionably the wonderful couple we met, here visiting their daughter in the Ph.D. program at UCSB and staying by the Naval base at Point Magu. J went to talk to someone and I spotted a tub of Red Vines, my favorite candy in high school. I powered through so many of those while studying for AP exams and even before that, working on debate cases.

Let me explain for any misguided souls who think Red Vines and Twizzlers are equivalent. These two red, sugary, fake dye candies have nothing whatever to do with one another. Red Vines are sublime and Twizzlers are repulsive. I don’t know if the red dye in Red Vines kills you but the aftertaste, texture and artificiality of Twizzlers must if consumed with any regularity.

I told the couple how much I loved them and the wife, originally from DC, did too and we swapped licorice stories. J took longer than I expected so we knew quite a bit about each other by the time he joined us. The husband was a Navy test pilot. He was in great shape but judging by the white, ample hair no younger than 60. He retired from the Navy in 2003 and is so cool.  It is inspiring to see truly great marriages of 28 years. I have seen a few of late which look great from the outside but are total fucking disasters in reality and you can’t know if a marriage is good only by talking to one of the parties involved.  You have to spend time with a couple together to make any accurate assessment and often the husbands or wives who talk up their amazing spouses ad nauseum (in public or private) are the ones concealing the ugliest domestic realities imaginable.

A corollary of this Victorian Chick marital maxim: you can determine if a marriage sucks by speaking only with one spouse, because as much as one loves the Judy Davis/Kevin Spacey therapy session with which The Ref opens, when Davis asks, “How can we be in the same marriage and you’re happy and I’m miserable?” and Spacey answers in his inimitable sardonic way, “Luck,” it’s not a great marriage when one spouse is miserable. Besides, in this example, Spacey is not happy and for all her faults, she knows this, “Bullshit. You’re so unhappy you can barely breathe. And I feel it in every word, every glance.”  So you can tell if a marriage sucks by knowing one spouse very well, but you can’t know for sure where the blame lies without knowing both parties to the domestic disaster.

Second corollary: a bad marriage is very rarely only one person’s fault but that doesn’t mean it’s 50/50 across the board (nor does the “two sides to every story” truism mean that one person’s perception of reality isn’t a lot better than the other’s). Very often one spouse is far more responsible for the misery than the other and I have seen more than a few where the only fault of the long-suffering spouse is staying in a marriage with someone who will not get help or try to fix him/herself. Of course, the responsibility starts a lot sooner with the selection of an unsuitable or inappropriate or severely damaged mate, which usually has to do with unresolved parental conflict as well as sheer blindness and denial about who the damaged prospective spouse really is.

But this couple was the real deal. You could see they were so in love as well as best friends with a life full of laughter and fun. Their daughter is finishing her doctorate this year at the tender age of 26. That’s very impressive and means she went straight through–five years–and didn’t take any time off after college. No one gets a doctorate in the humanities in five years anymore (M.A./Ph.D.). The structure and intent of a humanities dissertation precludes completion in that time, whereas in science the intent of the dissertation is somewhat different and the document which presents your original research is shorter and not intended to be “book-ready” (with some editing and revisions of course). Even so, 26 to finish the Ph.D. is seriously impressive.

It turns out the couple shoots so J talked guns with them and it was a blast. They’re from the East Coast and have two post-college children. They told us the hilarious story of how they met but I don’t feel comfortable sharing. I would love to see them in June when they come for their daughter’s graduation and didn’t have a card or get theirs but could probably find the daughter by year, department and last name. They have a “mixed marriage”: she rides a Harley and he a Ducati. I joked that this was probably better than having a Red Sox /Yankee mixed marriage and they fully agreed. I met such a mixed marriage couple in San Francisco in February and that was actually a mixed marriage: gorgeous light-skinned black man with a lovely blonde and a 1-yr-old in Red Sox and Yankee attire! I thought if anything sartorial could lead to schizophrenia, it would be such an outfit. But the little guy was happy as a clam and gurgly and cute as can be.

The chips were magical and I’m not big on chips. I never eat potato chips and never really did as a kid or teen. These were spectacular with the homemade salsa and the simple cheddar and jack slices on sourdough were good too. In fact, that was dinner for me, having had the following at Whole Foods for lunch. J pointed out it was a less than appetizing picture and that I didn’t have a future as a food photographer with this splattered ricotta on the environmentally friendly but perpetually infuriating Whole Foods hot bar container. (I think most of my food pictures are okay.)

Sampling from Whole Foods hot bar for Saturday lunch (7.50 only!)

My Facebook friends thought this was a lot of food but if you measure by the size of the sprouts, you can see the slider is tiny as is the bit of lasagna. But I was more than sated and just snacked at the party, where they also had fresh cut veggies with ranch dressing on the side.

J had a beer named Victoria! I didn’t know I had my own beer since I don’t care for beer except Shock Top and I am sure craft beer but I would rather have diet Coke than any cheap beer, either in a can or a bottle. I cannot imagine being so hard up for booze that I would drink Coors, Miller or Bud. My father only drank Dos Equis, Grolsh, St. Paulie Girl, Heineken or Kirin if in a Japanese restaurant. He drinks one of the good non-alcoholic beers now but my father would never drank canned beer. The very idea was unimaginable.  Here I am with my beer (J’s beer).

Victorian Chick holding Victoria beer!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I felt like Romney’s daughter at the party. The top is an Armani my aunt got very cheap at an outlet. It’s a beautiful top with a blue silk back and a lined front. I didn’t get a picture of the unusual design but I have an Armani second-hand dress with an creative diamond-shaped back, so Armani must be known for interesting and original back designs.  The skirt was one of the Orange County finds, just 10 dollars at New Directions: www.newdirections.com, the store whose proceeds aid a battered women’s shelter.

In the pictures below, it looks short but it’s a conservative Nordstrom brand skirt, just two inches above the knee. Here is a sample of the women’s outfits from the party (I felt too self-conscious to take pictures of the women on the back patio with the food and music–about half thin, half not–with ultra-short mini-dresses and 6 inch heels). But this was outside and I could pretend to be taking pictures of palm trees or the sky over the 101 freeway.

Female biking attire at Ducati party.

I had to blow this picture up because those pants strain credulity without magnification. I will say, at least the women dressed horribly were thin. Thin and badly dressed always trumps fat and badly dressed. But even thin, this just boggles the mind.

Here are some of the bikes parked on Montecito Street (the dealership is not in Montecito; ironically Montecito Street is in one of the not so hot areas of Santa Barbara).

Bikes parked outside Ducati of Santa Barbara

I already posted the following pictures of me on the Victorian Chick Facebook page and my own personal ones but I will re-post here.

Victorian Chick on Ducati

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another view.

Front view

J also took one of me on a beautiful green Vespa with a lush, brown, saddle-leather seat. A bad picture of me but a nice bike.

Victorian Chick on Vespa.

The funny thing is I have 4-inch spiky ankle boots, fabulous black J Brand Skinny Flare jeans and a leather jacket I never knew I wanted but absolutely adore, a real find in South Norwalk, CT at a Jones New York outlet in fall of 2010. It was originally 400 and I got it for 79 because it was a small and a model at least one, maybe two, years old and they just wanted to get rid of it. Of course, the jeans weren’t clean. Neither were any of my other dark pants. So I thought this would be summery and nice. I have some very sexy, high, strappy, slightly kinky (due to the zipper on the heel) 5-inch heels which would have fit right in at the party but I am not entirely clear about their present location. I think they are in the Bermuda Triangle which is Victorian Chick’s Saab and I intend to make a day-long project sorting through all the shit which used to be in the backseat and since the robbery, filling the trunk to the gills.

This morning I intended to walk at Miramar Beach (I’ve blogged about this my favorite beach in Montecito before) but of course got involved on Facebook. When J arose, I proposed a trip to Blush, whose brunch had just come up on the ticker. It was hands down the best brunch I have had at a restaurant in Santa Barbara. (You can’t compare a restaurant brunch to the Four Seasons/Biltmore and yes, that’s out of this world.)

I vacillated between the lobster mascarpone and chives and Farmer’s omelets. I was so happy the server nudged me to the latter, just 12 dollars, with the best, healthiest potatoes in Santa Barbara. Breakfast is my thing, or one of my things. I eat omelets at least three days a week and it used to be more. I’m trying to be good about money so go to Whole Foods three days a week now. The eggs were absolutely perfect and the veggies–asparagus, onions, mushroom, and bell peppers fresh, flavorful and cooked to perfection–were surrounded by the perfect amount of white cheddar cheese. I wish they had breakfast during the week!

Best omelet ever: Farmer's omelet at Blush SB. Excellent, relatively healthy potatoes.

The Mimosas (or whatever drink you like) are “nearly” bottomless: up to five per person! I had three so just five dollars each. An individual Mimosa is 9 so if you have two for 15, you’re still saving 3 dollars and the savings increase the more soused you get! All kidding aside, I love Blush. It was the first date restaurant for me and J, in August of 2010 and I adore their signature lobster mac and cheese. I leave off the pancetta as I do not comprehend why, with a mixture of expensive cheese and lobster, you would ruin a dish with what is essentially a fancy form of bacon, not a food I enjoy. I do like pancetta on occasion but not with something that amazing.

Here is a happy post-brunch, pre-swim picture.

Outside BlushSB on State Street in Santa Barbara

The dress is from Priscilla’s of Boston. Mom had cataract surgery on Brighton Way in Beverly Hills a few months ago and I went to eat at Nate and Al’s. It was the first restaurant I ever saw with Jewish Journal outside! David Mamet had a piece in it–you know, in his post-”braindead” phase–and the cover was about the Woody Allen documentary which I was dying to see but didn’t get to tape or get someone else to tape for me. They said they were going out of business. This is false. They are not in Chapter 11, or so I understand from someone whose mother knew Priscilla herself quite well and used to practice that kind of law on very large scale. They are merely closing part of the business in order to re-invest capital in another part.

But all dresses were 75% off and all bridesmaids’ dresses 20 dollars. This dress was not popular when I posted on FB. It is a little big in the bottom but tiny and tight on top and the back is stunning, with a triangular dip pointing down. I love suits and dresses which have this detail as I think it’s flattering to all. I now have the Freepeople dress in purple (also strapless) I got at TJ Maxx for just 50 last summer (originally 145), the Vera Wang for 130 at a designer resale with the added benefit of a slip which functions as a negligee, and this for 20. I do love this color. Lavender is always a good choice for a green-eyed girl.

I’m heading back to J’s now, where he is going to grill hot dogs. I will probably have one but no bun, with the rest of the Nobilo Sauvignon I got at Trader Joe’s this week. I posted the picture below on Victorian Chick FB in an album, “Homeless Chic: the Next Generation,” which explains the comfort wedges to which I am so attached.

Vera Wang slip for dress which doubles as house dress or nightgown.

Share
Posted in Fashion, Food & Wine, Health & Beauty, Lifestyle, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Victorian Chick’s Childhood Among the “Beautiful People” and Lifelong Reverence of Beauty in all its Forms

This week on J's upper balcony.

Just about any beautiful woman could become a professional beauty–not through success at court, but in the emerging celebrity culture associated with illustrated  periodicals and mass-circulated photographs. The professional beauty needed not be rich, highly born, nor well educated–provided she had sense enough to escape from committing any glaring missteps–all that was required of her was that her face should be approved by society as a great beauty and her future was assured.

–Evangeline Holland, founder of                                              Edwardian Promenade blog (March 17, 2008)

Earlier today,  Greg Hilton posted a picture of Pippa Middleton committing an unpardonable fashion sin, unless she was attired for a 1980s-themed party. Donning what look like hot pink leg warmers, cheap plastic neon pink glasses and a tight black dress, I instantly thought back to my 6th grade graduation parties for St. Augustine-by-the-Sea school, the small, hippie, artsy liberal arts industry school I attended only because I went to pre-school at Kinderdance (owned by Buddy Ebsen and his sister) in Pacific Palisades with a girl named Ari.

Ari’s dad was on the Board of Directors at St. Augustine (now Crossroads Elementary) and simply told the board and/or Paul Cummings, the principal whom Mom informed me started over and founded another little liberal and liberal arts school in Santa Monica after leaving Crossroads, that “Maria” his little girl’s best friend and that she therefore must go to the same school as Ari (where her big sister also went).

The Venas lived on Rivas Canyon, just a minute away, and while I had nearly perfect grammar and spelling by second grade, I persisted well into first grade saying, “Me and Ari want to go to the park” or “Me and Ari are going to climb the tree in front.”  My mother never corrected me as she thought it just darling as well as uncharacteristic of my overall speech patterns.

Having watched from the wings as my dear Jersey friend, a sister to me really, went through the incomprehensible-cum-outlandish process of applying to private Jersey kindergartens, the story amuses me all the more. Paul didn’t even meet my father as I recall. I don’t know who took me for the interview–whose sole purpose was to determine I was neither moronic nor psychotic–and in a few short minutes I seemed to convince him or Mimi Baer (vice-principal and mother of very successful TV writer and producer of Law and Order, Neal Baer) that I was neither. No test, no writing sample, no practice day, no long dissertations about my parents’ hopes, dreams, interests, or fears! Just okay, she’s cute and smart and polite and comes well-recommended so as long as the check doesn’t bounce we’re cool!

St. Augustine (a secular private) formed me as much Westlake did (Harvard-Westlake now). Not because of the famous parents or the classmates famous in later life like Gwyneth Paltrow or Maya Rudolph, both class of 1984 with me, nor the very successful TV writers like Shana Goldberg-Meehan (my best friend for most of elementary school and classmate through 12th grade at Westlake though we were not close from about 10th grade on), who wrote for sitcoms like Mad About You, Friends and Joey, before executive-producing and creating her own CBS sitcom which I never saw. Chris(sy) Levinson went on to write Charmed and go on to Law and Order, where Nick(y) Wootton also ended up after years with Bochco (his mentor) on NYPD Blue and then their own one-season show on ABC in 2005, Blind Justice.

Shana, however, had a very deep influence on  my life because Gary (Lou Grant, Family Ties, Spin City) and his wife Diana (founder of the Archer School for Girls in Brentwood, the only secular private girls’ school left in LA other than Marlborough which is simply not an option for Westsiders due its distant and also cumbersome location in Hancock Park) invited me to England in 1984.

I have yet to visit Continental Europe, but Gary and Diana invited me to London in the summer of 1984, during the filming of Family Ties in London. We stayed, though it meant nothing to me then, beyond a beautiful place, in a suite in the Grosvenor House. The cast stayed at the Dorcester, but Gary, Diana, Shana, Betsy (au pair) and I were at the Grosvenor house for some two weeks. Shana had a baby sister (between one or two I would guess) and Betsy came along as much to look after the baby as to supervise these two sixth grade graduates headed for Westlake and feeling like very big girls indeed!

A list of the school’s roster at the time was like a Who’s Who in Hollywood, though it was more TV than film, though plenty of the parents acted and directed in film, such as Blythe Danner and Peter Hyams. In our class alone, we had writers of I Love Lucy, All in the Family, Maude, Columbo, Lou Grant, Family Ties, and Murder She Wrote. Steven Bochco, Hollywood television royalty like David Kelley (who wasn’t yet big), had a girl named Melissa a few years ahead of me and a son named Jesse, a few years behind me. Jesse went on, at an extraordinarily young age, to direct episodes of NYPD Blue, which I would have loved even if Hill Street Blues hadn’t been what George Eliot would have called “an epoch in my life.” No show of the 1990s moved me like NYPD Blue and I always thought Bochco was a flat out genius.

Of course being around all that talent was amazing. The kids were all so bright and artistic themselves and our teachers–music, drama, dance–were all accomplished in their own right, though not famous or financially successful. The emphasis was on reading and writing. Who cared about math and science? Other people could go to med school and God forbid business school, which would have been considered just oh so gauche, or at the very least, uncreative. Life was about art and beauty in every sense. Law was fine because at least it was verbal and if you had to do something like that, law was not so bad.

It is telling that not a single person that I know of in our class–many of whose students went to Ivies or Stanford or Berkeley–went on to med school. They weren’t breeding scientists or doctors at that school! Math? Eeeww. It says something that I was the best girl in the class in math and that they hired me a specialist as I was about two years ahead and by 5th or 6th grade had finished all the books. I’m not totally hopeless at math but I only got an A in dummy math in high school (non-honors, non-AP) and I’m terrible at math compared to anyone who takes BC Calculus senior year. I got a 78/C+ on my first 7 Honors math test at Westlake and was horrified, first because we had no grades at St. Augustine (just evaluations with check marks), and second because it was a C!

It was then I realized, being the smartest girl in the class in math at St. Augustine was a thoroughly meaningless distinction! (I was, honestly, considered the smartest girl in the class overall and generally did my own thing, writing current events reports three times the normal length with articles twice as long.) In college, most of us majored in history or English, though some majored in government (at Harvard, the name for political science) and people either went into the industry or law. One became a novelist of some note, Alexander Maksik.

But the school instilled a passion for beauty in me which has been the single guiding force of my life, both intellectually and personally. Before I even knew what philosophical aesthetics was in any substantive sense, my freshman year at Yale, questions of beauty–its origins as well as its implications–dominated my readings of literary texts. I didn’t care a bit about the political or economic forces embedded in the sonnet form. Intuitively, I was a Yale School of Criticism, New Critic kinda girl.

Of course, growing up in the heart of the entertainment industry (most Hollywood people don’t live in Hollywood of course; they live in Santa Monica, Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Brentwood, Westwood or Bel Air, perhaps), I developed a highly acute sense of physical beauty and its significance in life. Almost all mothers in the school were very thin and in good shape. There might be the stray heavy mom, but it was very rare. It was, even among the non-industry moms, the beautiful people and there is no denying that growing up in image-conscious LA attunes you to the power of physical appearance. Of course, we had character actresses as parents too, like Bochco’s wife, Barbara Bosson.

Bosson was never beautiful but she had gravitas and power as an actress and I adored her on Bochco’s 2-season drama Murder One in 2000. Daniel Benzali and Stanley Tucci , along with younger talents like Mary McCormack, rounded out the cast of that groundbreaking drama, whose entire season was organized around a single murder trial. No legal or cop drama had ever done this and apparently LA Times writer Mary Macnamara was right in saying that as much as the public claims to want novelty, they generally reject it.

The term “beautiful” on Hill Street would have been reserved for Veronica Hamel, the actress who played the girlfriend of Captain Frank Furillo (Daniel Travanti), the long-suffering, sober ex-husband of Bosson’s unglued and usually hysterical ex-wife. (I must say how shocking it was when Steven and Barbara–who lived in Brentwood near the Goldbergs and the Sikkings before Gary and Diana moved to Oakmont Drive, by OJ’s Rockingham estate but further up in a gated community in a gorgeous home bordered by Germaine Jackson and James Garner–split after some three decades of marriage. One never heard a bit of gossip and they seemed truly like the most stable couple in Hollywood.)

Of course, the homes and neighborhoods these industry people lived were dreamlike in their quiet, rustic and expansive feel. My parents, as I have written, bought a tract house in the Palisades in 1974 for 125K dollars. It was and remains a very basic house as they were civil servants, albeit at a very high level, U.S. Attorney and 9th Circuit Federal bankruptcy judge. Obviously government lawyers and TV royalty didn’t inhabit the same sort of dwellings! But all of these areas are so physically beautiful and if you want physical beauty–meaning greenery–in West Los Angeles, you will essentially pay large sums of money for expensive pieces of dirt. If you have a gorgeous house of four or five thousand square feet (a mansion by WLA standards), you are going to pay many millions for homes which would be no more than 500K in many parts of America, namely places not on the coasts.

There is, however, no question that my attachment to natural beauty and landscape derives from the good fortune of this “grandfathering” into the school I would not ever have been admitted had it not been for Ari’s father. St. Augustine had a sibling policy, whereby every sibling of a kid who got in was automatically admitted unless there was something severely wrong with him or her. Each grade had 25 kids so if you knocked out a third for siblings, another odd percentage for connections and industry kids, there weren’t a whole lot of spaces for the daughters of prosecutors and judges. It’s pretty much impossible to get in these days, though the school has expanded by I think double.

I will blog tomorrow about the “professional beauty” in Edwardian England as discussed by Evangeline Holland. But reflecting as I am wont to do on the miraculous good fortune of being born in the Palisades and attending this little pre-school called Kinderdance (at which we did pretty much nothing but finger-paint, read stories and do ballet) and of there meeting this little girl whose father would get me into a school so special I still marvel at the influence it had on my life, I am reminded of one of the best scenes in Mike Nichols’ Postcards from the Edge. Meryl Streep thinks she is late for “looping” and arrives flustered, only to find that she is early. Gene Hackman awaits her and they talk about how sobriety is going for her. He says her problem (among others) is that she want life to be like the movies. She concedes the point, “I don’t want life to imitate art: I want life to be art.”

Most of us at St. Augustine were raised to want life to be art as well. Technology, math, science, medicine: yuck. Even the doctor parents in our class or surrounding classes didn’t give birth to children who went on to follow in their footsteps, as if to say, we worked very hard in this difficult field so that you don’t have to. And technology was like the essence of anti-creativity. We didn’t have bankers, though of course there are people who worked in the stock market in LA. I just don’t think the people at the school wanted to have people working in such a worldly and mundane profession, no matter how wealthy. Businesspeople were boring: that’s what we were raised to believe.  This clearly is very different from the elite secular private elementary schools in Manhattan chock full of the kids of financiers.

All of us were instilled with the idea that the deepest meaning in life always derived from art.  Perhaps ultimately one learned to practice law to further one’s artistic passions, if only as an appreciator of art, later in life. Joe Morgenstern, the film critic for the Wall Street Journal was a St. Augustine dad, as was Gil Bellows, a big guy at the LA Times. Criticism was respected as well.

But at the end of the day, art is what mattered, whether it was dance, drama, literature, music , painting, fashion, or sculpture. I felt that way then and I still feel that way now. And I am fortunate to be able to live my life without the pursuit of rent and food, which of course encroaches upon the very spirit of art, which is “play,” and for Kant, the harmony of the faculties and imaginative freedom. Financial insecurity and terror are the enemies or art and the freedom which underlies it.

 

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Quick Pre-Dinner Blog from SBAC: Sunday NYT Review and a Carrot Cooler

 

Perfect post on FB to describe my utterly useless day today.

I am giggling to myself , camped out on the top floor of SBAC which has undergone extensive remodeling. I was heartbroken last summer when they did away with the pro shop and the new corporate ownership has definitely changed the club and not entirely for the better though the fancy pilates studio is nice. I found a plug after much searching to do a quick blog with a head’s up about a few good pieces in Sunday’s “Review” section the New York Times.

But I have to explain why I look like a mental patient, laughing to myself as I sit on my Macbook Pro sipping the carrot/apple/ginger/low cal frozen yogurt shake I dreamt about at length during my nap and decided I simply had to have though I am meeting J at Fresco for dinner in an hour. When I walk up to the desk to explain I am here only for a shake, not to work out, there is what seems like a new (and not nice) lady next to the blonde with whom I had words a few months ago over my 4PM arrival and desire to swim for 20 minutes. And she glared at me.

For those of you who didn’t know me then, there is a blonde who’s been here some time. She is now apparently engaged and very proud of herself for finding someone to put up with her (till death do they part) and to give her a fairly impressive rock. I wrote a public Facebook note about her–”Don’t Fuck with Victorian Chick!”–when she so irked me I had to unleash my verbal wrath on this insufferable woman, about 30 I’d guess. She doesn’t look a day under her age, by the way, from the neck up, though I realize my standards are coastal: Southern CA and NYC (plus anything within an hour of the city). We have different standards of beauty, weight, and youth on the coasts.

As I wrote in my note (and subsequently in milder form on Victorian Chick), the people who work at SBAC from the janitors to the trainers, the teachers to desk people, are all wonderful. The old manager and I (and my mother who intervened on my behalf) had words but she was a great woman who did so much for breast cancer charity. She threatened to cancel my membership because the minuscule locker room has nowhere to chill out after a steam. So apparently someone complained that I would lie down or stretch a bit on the benches. It isn’t my fault the bonehead SB architect built locker rooms the size of closets!  She was actually quite cruel to me in her letters and on the phone and I cried a lot about it. That was oh, 12 years ago.

I love Flavia and Lourdes, both maintenance women, who have known me a decade I think and it really is a family. We speak in Spanish exclusively and I always laugh a lot with both of them. But this chick is a piece of work and never, since 1998 when I joined, have I met a more irritating person here.  I was across the street at the DMV and a couple years ago, I got the non-primetime membership which knocks off about 30 or 35 bucks from the monthly dues. This means that for over a decade, though I never used the club from 4 to 8 (I came at 8PM on weekdays and 6PM on weekends before the 8PM closure), I was paying the full membership dues. The DMV was typically efficient so I arrived an hour late, at 4PM, and wanted to swim 20 minutes. The desk girl wasn’t great but she was young and who cared.

Then I got the blonde. She used to work the desk and I had already had a conversation with Her Highness about the cafe’s closure, at which point she informed me that she was “assistant to the assistant manager.” Apparently this was supposed to induce a kind of awe and wonder in me and when it failed so to impress, her winning personality emerged in full force.

So when, in my post-DMV mood (which was not fabulous, I admit), I launched into my “I’ve been overpaying for for this overpriced gym which is the only option in town for anyone who is accustomed to a nice gym in any city in the country, not to mention the 10 years I paid full price when I only came at 8PM” spiel, she wasn’t thrilled.

Now, you have to understand: people in Santa Barbara think SB is heaven. If you dare to disagree, you’re regarded as some kind of heretic and treated as a pariah. My boyfriend’s mother, a doctor from Brooklyn and a Barnard girl, dared to say something at a dinner with some people from the temple (where they did not feel at home at all) and it was nothing like what I would have said if people were being rude to me and then asked, “So, how do you like it here?” She was mild as can be and when she said, essentially, that they hadn’t found their niche (25 or so years in Houston prior to the move), the house guests from the temple were just terrible and rude to her. There is only one Reform temple in SB so they aren’t members of a temple, for the first time in their lives.

I proceeded to list every major gym I’ve worked out in on the East and West Coasts for the last 20 years and explain that the only reason this club can get away with charging as much as SCLA and Equinox is because it’s a podunk town which masquerades as a city…. You get the point. (J would call this “Victoria making friends again….” I can’t help it: this is the Dad side of me, which oddly horrifies my mother when it comes through me, but bothers her very little when it is in fact The Ordin behaving this way.)

So she got her hackles up and issued a veiled threat: “Well , if this is how you feel, maybe we should reconsider you [sic] being a member still.” That was it. I was pissed. She said she wouldn’t be spoken to in this manner and I said that was a good thing because I had no more use for the conversation either, a sort of My Cousin Vinny tribute (“I got no more use for this witness”) and asked to speak to her supervisor. Unbeknownst to me, the once desk girl and later “assistant to the assistant” was now in membership.

Julie Barker comes out, a lovely woman I knew in the days she was in bookkeeping and she politely explained that corporate had installed some kind of Stalinesque surveillance hooked up to the computers and if the desk person had allowed me with my non-primetime membership to work out, she could have been fired. All that blonde–who lost a lot of weight and has a good body now but a sort of sunken face with as much makeup as Snooki–had to say was that the policies had changed radically and she was sorry, but that I would have to use a guest pass to work out. Done. Problem solved. (Before her weight loss she was kinda, well, the word my father would have used for her volleyball thighs would have been horsey.)

Instead, the blonde super-thin Snooki of Santa Barbara with a rock on her hand had to take me on. This, by the way, is a bad idea on just so many levels. First, I write every fucking thing that happens to me on Facebook, however mundane or trivial. I have repeatedly gotten the kindest words from my FB friends and readers, saying some version of the following: “You write about shit I don’t care about at all and some of it is so mundane I cannot even believe you’re writing about it and yet you make it so entertaining and interesting.”

And even if not on my wall, I write marathon comments on the walls of others and if you piss me off in a service capacity I will destroy and/or humiliate you with a torrent of words you can only begin to imagine and dread. My Facebook husband has written about my horrible long screeds along with my verbal velocity and won’t even argue about a serious issue in writing as he simply has not a chance to keep up with me.

Now, blasting an asshole at the car wash or a bitch at the club happens very little as I am super low-key about service in restaurants, very tolerant of the vast majority of service people. I don’t get upset when cars cut me off. I’m very easygoing. My rule is this: I can tolerate stupidity and incompetence, as long as the stupid person is fully aware of his/her stupidity and makes no pretense of having a brain. Stupid and nice is cool. Stupid and arrogant or rude: sorry, this doesn’t fly with me.

I ended up using one of my two guest passes (a policy of which I was unaware) and attacked the water for 20 minutes. I hadn’t swum that hard in a long time but I was so pissed off that when I called Mom an hour or two later, she said, “Wow, I haven’t heard this kind of anger in years! ” (That was when it was directed at her.) We had a good laugh about the whole thing.

Alas, I am meeting J at Fresco at 6:30 and must go. But I wanted to note a few pieces worth looking at in Sunday’s “Review.

1.  ”Down with Everything,” by Thomas Friedman. I hang with Republicans on FB in the main but more liberals in real life.  To conservatives, Friedman is the anti-Christ, along with Paul Krugman. How many of them are qualified to render judgment in matters economic is an open question with me but that’s why I remain so intimate with hardcore Republicans. We do not get into it. I haven’t read Friedman since his book, From Beirut to Jerusalem. A brilliant man I know says that was the last good thing to come out of the man, who it turns out, is uber-rich. Not like 500K a year sort of rich. He married some sort of heiress and has a shitload of money. I don’t think he really presents himself as a .05%-er but I could be wrong.

It’s about Francis Fukuyama and the burdensomeness of our checks and balances, in particular the Senate confirmation process and filibuster. I’m not endorsing it, but it’s well-written.

2. “Teach the Books, Touch the Heart,” by a veteran public middle school teacher in Manhattan. It’s beautiful and its main point is that “what is lost in our zeal for testing is learning to love literature.” These are the stories which you will never hear in the bashing of teacher’s unions. I know teacher’s unions are often very destructive. But teachers are saints. They do the most important work imaginable and we can’t give up on teachers just because some of the unions are full of belligerent and incompetent people more invested in union power and self-aggrandizement than the education of our youth.

3.  ”Is Therapy Forever? Enough Already,” by Jonathan Alpert, author of “Be Fearless: Change Your Life in 28 Days.” I haven’t read this piece yet but I’m thinking it would be fun and fabulous to review. Analysis and therapy are topics which obviously interest me deeply and I think I know a lot about both of them, both from the study of theory and the experience of praxis across modalities.

Okay, I have to run. Happy Thursday!

 

 

Share
Posted in Health & Beauty, Lifestyle, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Heavenly Night at SBAC: Victorian Chick Back at the Gym for Summer/Somewhat Serious Reflections on my (Jewish) Grandmother, the Scars of Poverty, and my Shiksa Slob Gene

Newish Integrity pilates studio at SBAC: pretty impressive for little sleepy SB!

 

Sitting in apartment, waiting for gardening to pass before undertaking higher-minded activities. Well, one isn’t really a noble pursuit: moving the shit I moved into my room when I was going to “take on a boarder” as Dad put it before Asshole put an end to that. It ended up being for the best. First of all, who wants a roommate? Second of all, I am now spending more time in my own apartment writing and reading and now more than ever, I don’t want one, never having had a roommate in my life since 1990, fall term at Yale. The six boxes I moved out of the large closet for the first prospect–very attractive, thin, Asian OCD case–were all closed and thus not creating a visual disturbance.

But now, I have gone through some of them to find things and it’s messy in my beautiful little room. Also I have a 17-inch box TV, about a dozen years old and a little wooden stand I should throw out (hard to explain, nothing anyone would want and just the thing on which my ex-best friend who stored her stuff for years in that room placed various cabinets).

Also, I’ve been here more and it would be nice to do a little cleaning. Well, not nice of course. It would be nice to enjoy the fruits of having cleaned. My father is Jewish and secular and his secular Jewish mother regarded a clean garage floor as the closest a person got to God. Even at the industrial property she owned, she’d go up the ladders to clean the rain gutters because anyone she hired after her beloved Ashton and Evelyn either died or retired (they were black, which is very strange in LA but more common back then, because you rarely see cleaning people who are black, though he was a great handy man too), she never found a suitable replacement. Keep in mind, these are giant buildings on large plots of land. Grandma said every housekeeper or maintenance person was a schtunk.

This 5 foot tall terror would go through the toilets and clean them all herself. It was not even a matter of being cheap. Grandma was a great businesswoman with an 8th grade education and a childhood of poverty which truly mangled her for life and resulted in unspeakable suffering both for my father and subsequent generations of Ordins. Of course, the money she made and invested is a great blessing and the reason I don’t have to work, as long as I am extremely careful with money. It’s not enough to live on and my parents supplement it of course.

It would be nice to make enough just to lighten their load (that is, be able to live on the monthly take from inheritance plus my own labors), but Grandma’s hard work and acute business sense–plus my mother’s and father’s outrageously hard work all their lives combined with frugality minus the 54 foot ketch–is the reason I can live the life of Victorian Chick and I never ever forget that,  though it doesn’t mitigate the astonishing mental trauma that one little tiny woman inflicted on our family dynamic and my father’s psyche above all.

Grandma lived from 1970 to the mid-1980s in West Hollywood on Holloway Drive when my parents moved into her adorable (now worth a ton) house on Doheny Drive, north of Sunset up from Hamburger Hamlet.  Holloway is just off the Sunset Strip, down from what used to be Book Soup and Tower Records (RIP, Tower Records). They moved out of that house when I was two and ended up paying her back in a short period of time.  Her apartment building is unchanged and I passed it the day Mom retired, taking a slew of pictures of Hollywood and West Hollywood during a bout of extreme nostalgia. I will post those another day: 8558 Holloway Drive is the building arranged in classic California style around a pool in the middle of the ground floor. It was a one-bedroom but large and all the furniture she crammed into that place filled a 2 bedroom, 2 bath house with enormous living room on the corner of Carmelina and San Vicente in Brentwood.

Dad made her move because before West Hollywood became uber-trendy, expensive and gay, it wasn’t that safe. There’s another argument in favor of gays: they’re non-violent and they don’t create welfare problems, i.e. welfare queens as they don’t breed naturally and when they have kids, they tend to have money and go through all manner of shit to get a baby through in vitro and other expensive biomedical mishigas. Dad bought Grandma a .38 Smith and Wesson (I think) which my sister and her husband on occasion take to a shooting range. She never had to use it but the last time there was a robbery nearby, he finally said she had to move and she bought that charming little house (no bigger than 1700 square feet, if that) in Brentwood. It is amazing my father prevailed on her: Grandma gave orders, she didn’t take them.

Of course, anyone who knows WLA real estate knows that every time an old person or couple dies, someone moves in and builds a behemoth (hopefully not a gold palace of the sort you see in the Valley, particularly Tarzana which, sorry, is just an awful place) which is at least two times too big for the lot. Grandma’s Carmelina house was no exception, but happily this was not–I do not mean this to be racist but I just do not like the Middle Eastern sort of architecture that mars the beauty of WLA–a garish structure with lion statues in front. How anyone can find this attractive is completely beyond my powers of comprehension.

That’s what happened to my father’s first wife’s modest and decrepit house on Bowling Green north of Sunset between Kenter and Bundy upon her death in 1999, where she and my father moved the second they could afford to get the hell out of Pasadena which my father still resents for what he regards as the miserable years he spent there for all kinds of reasons.  Oy vey! I would be so beyond pissed if I owned a 2 million dollar house across the street and had to look at that gaudy, tasteless, oversized piece of shit on a daily basis. One advantage to being unable to afford a house and renting until late middle age: if someone builds an eyesore across the street and it matters to you enough, you just give 30 days notice and move to a place whose view does not induce migraines or nausea.

But the house on the Western corner of San Vicente and Carmelina is lovely. It’s brick and some variant of Tudor and I like it a lot. It just doesn’t fit on the lot and there are no setbacks to speak of. Grandma’s garage at that house had white curtains with blue flowers over the washer/dryer and the floor literally was scrubbed weekly, with toothbrushes to get out the intractable stains or grease spots. My grandmother loved to clean.

Needless to say, my mother is not like this (not that she cleans anyway as we have always had help as long as I was alive). But even in her youth, when my father met her for the first time at her apartment and she told him to get a beer or something from the fridge, he took one look at that thing and said, “This ain’t the broad for me!” After his initial shock and horror, his immediate thought was that his mother would disown him if she got one look at this fridge.  I only learned this story recently, in the last few years anyway, because he said I almost had a different father. Now, Mom’s position is that she was 25 then and working her way through UCLA Law (true of course) and that I am 40 and have nothing of major consequence or pressure to do in life and thus that the condition of my Saab is unjustifiable.

Mom is neat now but not as absolutely compulsive as my father. Oddly his office at home is very cluttered and it is shocking to me that he can stand all those file cabinets, binders, books and computer-related objects. He seems not to mind it and it is only a function of age, I think, that he doesn’t. On the other hand, he has only gotten worse as far as picking up every stray object in every room in the house and launching into the following speech: “What’s this? How long has it been there? Why is it here? How long is it going to stay here? Where did it come from?” We tease him about this but the teasing doesn’t make it any less true or real.

Thus, the prospect of spending an hour going through the kitchen (no dishwasher here) and straightening up the bedroom and moving the six boxes and TV does not pull me with the kind of magnetic and irresistible force such clutter would have activated in my grandmother. She died in 1993 when I was at Yale and there was no funeral as she had no friends. Partly this was because everyone had died and partly it was because my grandmother had much in common with Ellis Grey, Meredith’s extremely damaged mother on Grey’s Anatomy, played by the luminous and elegant Kate Burton. (She also played Chief Reilly’s neighbor and girlfriend at the end of Season 2 and beginning of Season 3 in Rescue Me.).

One of my all-time favorite scenes in GA is when Ellis has a moment of clarity during her Alzheimer’s and wants to refuse the heart surgery. Meredith has power of attorney and in a brief scene you can easily pull up on YouTube but I can’t link to at the moment, she rehearses the litany of hardships her mother has inflicted upon her throughout her life and most especially now: “But I do it [all] because there’s no one else, because you have alienated everyone in your life and I’m the only one left.”

When Ellis persists and asks to be allowed to die (which she will without question absent surgery), Meredith holds firm. With a quiet strength in her voice even as her eyes fill with tears, she says, “And killing my mother is not going to be another thing that happens to me.” Fans of the show know that Ellis ends up dying but she does get the surgery. Powerful stuff and one of the reasons I feel so strongly that people who dismiss this drama (at least the first five seasons) as a “soap opera” are not just wrong but truly lacking in perception, insight and taste as TV critics. (I wonder what John Podhoretz in his role as film critic for The Weekly Standard, not editor of Commentary, thinks of the show, because I have concluded in the short time I have been reading his movie reviews that I see eye to eye with him on practically nothing, though his recently articulated general criteria for good film I pretty much agree with. I also find his tone abrasive and unnecessarily unkind.)

My grandmother’s story of poverty –which goes a long way to explaining my attitudes toward money and my complete agreement with George Bernard Shaw (my father’s favorite playwright after Shakespeare) that poverty is indeed “a cancer”–ultimately hinges upon the education for which she longed and was denied.  No one in my family doubts that my grandmother had a genius IQ. That she was absolutely crazy is also beyond dispute, though I think she had to have been bipolar and my father won’t go there. But she was absolutely batshit and damaged and full of rage and terror. Her greatest sorrow was not going to high school and I don’t precisely remember why she couldn’t have gone to public school after 8th grade but she didn’t. The youngest of ten in a Jewish tenement (her nine siblings were born in Hell’s Kitchen but she was actually born in Philadelphia before the family came to Los Angeles), Grandma was dirt poor.

And Grandma’s poverty undoubtedly exacerbated whatever tendencies she had toward mental illness. She was brilliant and sensitive and powerful and her poverty for the first two or so decades of life haunted her, even when she became middle class, then upper middle class, and then well-to-do. Poverty scarred her for life and everything awful in my father’s life emotionally traces back to her. His father was no prize but he was a good guy on many levels. Certainly, my father’s father browbeat him about making a living but my father’s parents were enormously supportive of him after WWII. He lived in their gorgeous Silverlake home during USC Law, which he attended on the GI bill (tuition plus 100 dollars a month). When my father bought the 36 foot Angleman ketch in the mid-1960s, there was a financial glitch and she bought him top of the line sails which he could not afford.

Dad essentially gave his first wife the house on Bowling Green and started over with my mother at 41. Grandma was always generous with money if he needed it. That was rare but he knew he could always go to her. So Grandma could be loving, loyal and generous as well as very funny, but there were always strings attached. She was the master of using money as a weapon and instrument of control. Dad has to fight his innate urges to do the same.

Parents with  money are not the same as parents without money, because if you’re poor or don’t have any real money to speak of, why on earth would an adult child who is not getting any help during the parent’s lifetime and not going to inherit anything of significance, put up with his/her abuse or at least control and nosiness? I have met, through FB, people who are married to spouses who do care what their parents think and it is incomprehensible to me. Just tell them to fuck off would be my advice. I know one couple, in fact, from a hardcore Pentecostal background, now Lutheran. The husband who makes a boatload of money still (or did for years) defer to his parents on religious matters (going to church) because it would upset his middle class parents. Who gives a shit what your parents think if they have no money? This makes no logical sense to me.

Grandma was good to me through elementary school. I would sleep over in the years my father wasn’t speaking to her and we’d play Scrabble, make chocolate ice cream sundaes and tapioca pudding and she would curl my hair. Then I developed a will around 7th grade and perceived her as negative and later toxic.  While I dropped by the Brentwood house on the way home from high school to chit chat (she bought me my 1988 Tercel at 16, my first laser printer at Yale which lasted ten years and cost 1000 dollars in 1990), I didn’t really want to be close to her. I didn’t know until recently that she paid for Yale for a year and a half because she wanted to. I had thought she paid about a third, which would have been 10K. My parents paid for the last three semesters in full, while she took care of my first three semesters. (I graduated in three years not four.)

I had no idea she was pissed at me and cut me out of the will, dying before she could change it back and the percentage had been radically reduced when she reconciled with my father. But Dad went to my two half-siblings and asked them to allow him to cut me back in and they did. I called her from Yale but if she had told me she wanted 3 calls a week, I would have obliged. I wasn’t an idiot and knew the financial situation in broad outlines, though I really had zero sense about money, what things cost and all that, till I graduated from college. I was modest in spending but had a credit card and never saw the statement, which was sent directly to my parents who paid it in full every month.

But Grandma and I never fought. She was a huge bossy pants–a quaint way of putting her fiercely domineering and controlling temperament and behavior–with my half-siblings. She was constantly trying to tell them how to live their lives because of course she knew better and why wouldn’t they listen when she had all the answers and they were complete morons ruining their lives who, if they only listened to her, would be perfectly happy in every aspect of life?

The lesson of my grandmother (though my mother’s family was just as poor and never got past the middle class, her father dying of alcoholic dementia on Ward’s Island around 1966, six years before I was born and her mother marrying a financially stable but by no means well-off man in the early 1960s) was this: poverty destroys generations of lives. It is also true, however, some people do better with poverty than others. The (Mexican) Sheridan side of the family seemed to handle poverty and middle-class living a lot more successfully than the Ordin side.  There is no nobility in poverty. Poverty sucks. Living paycheck to paycheck and having financial struggle all one’s life is neither glorious nor wonderful.

Money doesn’t buy happiness in marriage or any other relationship in life, but money can absolutely ruin a marriage through the stress it imposes. Money is universally listed among the top three sources  of conflict in marriage, along with infidelity and disagreements about parenting. Infidelity can be overcome. Deep-seated resentments and all the other things poverty brings about, at least in the shitty marriages I’ve seen, is a much deeper issue. And the couple doesn’t even have to be poor or middle class: often there are such widely divergent priorities about the spending of money or use of resources, that even when there is technically enough money to live a decent life, this is not possible because of the level of discord about the allocation of household funds.

Even those dipshit motivational speakers talked about this last weekend at The Love Event (see Monday blog). When you are under financial stress, everything in life deteriorates. So I may seem hardcore on  money issues, refusing even to consider a child in my financial condition, but this is why. (I wouldn’t have a kid as I am currently situated even if I made the leap to accepting public school, which I get a lot of shit for feeling is not something I’d like to do if I ever had one child.) My mother’s issues have nothing directly to do with poverty or her childhood with money.

A vast majority of people select a spouse unconsciously as a result of their childhoods and relationships with their parents. They are either trying to get a do-over with the parent who troubled them the most or clinging to a false fantasy of what the better or worse parent was. I am a huge believer in the idea that when one parent is a nightmare, s/he is only 50% of the problem. An abuser or neglectful narcissist cannot function in a family without the enabling of the “good spouse.” It’s good cop /bad cop and I also believe that when a person hates one parents and likes or loves the other, s/he is in major denial about the role of the apparently “good parent.”

And because of the hatred for the bad parent, it is too frightening to admit to the anger at the good parent. After all, one might be abandoned or punished and lose the little love one gets , along with eradicating the ONLY good memories of a miserable childhood. And let’s face it, how many people think their parents did a great, emotionally healthy job of raising them? I know very few, regardless of date of birth.

I know many women and men who see one parent as the villain and while this is not untrue, the failure to hold the passive, enabling parent responsible is the single biggest determining force in a failed romantic life as an adult, whether it’s multiple divorces or just quiet misery with a spouse to whom the adult child remains married. It’s no news: children of drunks pick drunks for spouses. Or dry drunks. This can all be avoided but too few people do work on themselves prior to their first marriage. Very few people enter their first marriages intentionally or with a full intentionality. It is almost always a reaction rather than an action.

Even bright, mature men who have undergone significant analysis often pick a dipshit narcissist the second time around. Women who bounce from husband to husband have the self-awareness of a gnat or they would wait till a healthy choice materialized. I have seen this too many times to count. So while I see money issues at the very core of my father’s issues and his mother’s insanity, they are subtler in the case of my mother. But certainly, her childhood experiences (moving some ten times before high school graduation) shaped all kinds of decisions she made in life, not all of which were beneficial either to her or to me. So yeah, I think money matters. A lot. More than one can possibly articulate but I have here given it a shot.

As you can all see, I would rather write than clean (actually, I’d rather write than do pretty much anything in life) and now must motivate at least to move those boxes into the second bedroom closet before a doctor’s appointment at 4:30. Here are some pictures of the remodel at SBAC, plus one of me out of the pool in the new suit which literally feels like you’re wearing nothing and just swimming nude. Lovely sensation! I’m being very good and even in three weeks or so, when I fly back to the city, I’ll be leaner, thinner, and tighter. I don’t like excess flesh on my body, past that which is necessary to create an aura of femininity. No one wants to look like a 12-yr-old boy though the look works on some, like Ellen Pompeo. But she has tits. Sandra Oh is beautiful and she has no tits. Tits are good. I don’t have a use for anything beyond the most minimal curve in the hips and I prefer thinner to thicker legs. A slight roundness in the ass is nice but slight. Christina Hendricks of Mad Men does not at all appeal to me from the neck down as an aesthetic ideal. Her face is perfect.

New Peak/Small Group Training Boot Camp torture chamber. A converted court.

Notwithstanding a drop-dead gorgeous man named Jacob at the helm of this boot camp thing they’re so excited about at the club, I will never do it. Pilates is great (machine, not mat as I blogged last summer) but 80 a pop and I just don’t have the money for it. I mean I could spend that but then I couldn’t do other things. Also it’s an ugly room and I like to be surrounded by beauty as much as possible. The Integrity pilates studio is stunning!

Downstairs weight room at SBAC

 

They have changed the floor and now it’s like the spongy ground at the playground designed to prevent accidents when little kids jump off the jungle gym, but it’s not actually spongy. The machines are relatively new and fine but it’s not what I would call a beautiful weight room by Equinox or SCLA standards.

 

Here is the outdoor locker room. As I wrote on the album for Victorian Chick Facebook fan page, the original architect had this brilliant idea of building two locker rooms for both genders: outside and inside. The theory, I gather, was to have a swimmer’s locker room before tile became standard as a locker room floor covering. I remember the carpeting out there, actually a few incarnations of the carpeting, before they finally put the tile in around 1999. It was a shock and I dislike change even now. Then? It rocked my world for weeks.

The gym is not big enough to have four locker rooms so instead of two great ones, one male and one female, there are two cramped ones for each. Moreover, the steam room in the outdoor locker rooms is a box. It should not even be called a room as not even one average-height woman can lie down flat. You have to put your feet on the wall or just sit upright. Stupid. Santa Barbara has a ridiculously small number of steam rooms. In 1996, there was only the SBAC one and the one at the Four Seasons for the spa, which you can’t “join” like you can a gym. Maddeningly, the sauna in the inside locker room–which I now think is okay but before regarded as a claustrophobic horror which I only used during a closure of the outside for renovation–is four times the size of these team room. Four women can lie flat in that room.

But the granite is nice and finally it looks like a locker room in a gym whose monthly membership rivals Sports Club and Equinox. I don’t know what initiation is these days but mine was knocked way down because I came from an IHRSA gym in New Haven and they cut me a break on that because I was a UCSB student, though this is not a formal policy by any means.

I have posted the pool area before and I am happy to report that the really disgraceful part of the overpriced club (with however very nice, affluent, middle-aged members–not the crowd at 24 Hour Fitness or Spectrum which is roughly equivalent to the crowd on State Street trying to get laid on a Saturday night before migrating to EOS, the place of last resort both because it’s open late and because the music is so loud that if you’re a complete moron devoid of personality, your prospective one-night-stand will never notice) was the cardio room.

There were giant TVs hanging down as in a hospital. The ceiling was too low–again, some bang-up job this Santa Barbara architect did some 30 or 40 years ago in designing this structure–and it was just unpleasant. Now, every machine from the treadmills to the ellipticals to the stationary bikes and stairclimbers, has its own little TV with iPad hook-up. Also, the carpet is no longer offensive and they went through some two or three changes before getting it remotely right. Some of the new machines, however, have a cumbersome and bewildering decimal system by which you change channels. This is annoying but not the end of the world.

But the pool saved my life. It truly did. I was the most physically fit depressive in history. I swam five to six days a week, walked on weekends, did my personal practice of yoga in my apartment. I drank water in abundance (too much, actually but that’s why I had perfect skin from the neck down till I was 37 and smoking regularly). I drank God knows how many dollars a week of fresh veggie juice from Lazy Acres. I didn’t eat out, didn’t drink, didn’t smoke, didn’t go out in the sun. I also didn’t have sex though I am not clear this provides health benefits.

It’s a lovely pool area and I am looking forward to being in the pool daily when in SB until I go back to New York in mid-May.

Happy Wednesday!

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments